Building a dependable event-driven architecture is by no means an easy feat. There is an entire array of engineering challenges you will have to face and decisions you will have to make. Among them, protocol fragmentation and choosing the right subscription model (client-initiated or server-initiated) for your specific use case are some of the most pressing things you need to consider. While traditional REST APIs all use HTTP as the transport and protocol layer, the situation is much more complex when it comes to event-driven APIs. You can choose between multiple different protocols. Options include the simple webhook, the newer WebSub, popular open protocols such as WebSockets, MQTT or SSE, or even streaming protocols, such as Kafka. This diversity can be a double-edged sword—on one hand, you aren’t restricted to only one protocol; on the other hand, you need to select the best one for your use case, which adds an additional layer of engineering complexity. Besides choosing a protocol, you also have to think about subscription models: server-initiated (push-based) or client-initiated (pull-based). Note that some protocols can be used with both models, while some protocols only support one of the two subscription approaches. Of course, this brings even more engineering complexity to the table.
This first part of the dual-track approach focuses on the identification and implementation of new digital tech throughout an organization, while also working to change cultures and business workflows impacted by the transformation, according to the report. While this step is critical, it is also complex and time consuming. The benefits may take time to come to fruition, which is why many executives are dissatisfied with current transformation results. Not only are executives impatient, but they don't have the second part of the dual-track to get them by, the report found. The second portion is a parallel track that hones in on areas overlooked in large-scale transformation tactics. These areas include the organization's ability to quickly connect and modernize hundreds of crucial processes that cross both business workflows and work groups, according to the report. This goal can be achieved through rapid-cycle innovation, which encourages business professionals outside of IT to propose and create new apps for updating existing workflow processes, with the goal of achieving quick wins for the company and supporting long-term transformation, the report found.
Circumstances created by a pandemic, such as COVID-19 have been hugely disruptive and could even render organizations paralytic, if they are far removed from any understanding of how technology is an imperative and not optional add on. This is why it is critical to have a proactive mindset to technology, instead of a reactive approach. Proactive investment in technology is helping organizations reap maximum benefits as this approach allows leaders to prepare their people to embrace and become comfortable in using technology, so that it becomes spontaneously embedded in an organization at a fundamental level. The investments we proactively made many years ago, whether in secure virtual platforms or AI driven due diligence processes that help automate how we finalize our contracts, has helped us seamlessly adapt to working with minimum disruption. The biggest asset has been the spontaneous comfort level of our people in adapting to this transformed scenario of working from home, due to their prior high degree of familiarity with using technology platforms and processes at work over the past many few years, ensuring our ability to optimize productivity.
Researchers offer many tools and ways to search for hacker-friendly IoT devices. The most effective methods have already been tested by botnet creators. In general, the use of certain vulnerabilities by botnets is the most reliable criterion for assessing the level of security of IoT devices and the possibilities of their mass exploitation. Searching for vulnerabilities, some attackers rely on the firmware (in particular, those errors that were discovered during firmware analysis using reverse engineering methods). Other attackers start looking for vulnerabilities searching for the manufacturer’s name. In any case, for a successful search, some kind of a distinctive feature of a vulnerable device is needed, and it would be nice to find several such features. ... There are really many vulnerabilities in IoT devices, but not all of them are easy to exploit. Some vulnerabilities require a physical connection, being near or on the same local network. The use of others is complicated by quick security patches. On the other hand, manufacturers are in no hurry to patch firmware and often admit it. Getting an accurate list of vulnerable IoT devices will require significant efforts, it is not just a one-time query.
"A lot of retailers, when they come back online, they're going to be focused on business processes and getting employees back to work. They're not necessarily thinking, 'maybe I need to update Windows on my computer terminal', or update POS terminal firmware." In retail, where surges in online transactions during the pandemic have forced retailers to quickly transform their ecommerce capabilities, hackers have shifted their focus to make the most of this opportunity. This includes changing-up well-known types of attacks by using them in different ways, such as exploiting credit cards within a different type of merchant platform, and targeting parts of retailers' systems that might otherwise slip through the cracks. We've already seen new forms of attacks on retailers take place during the pandemic. In late June, researchers at security software firm Malwarebytes identified a new web-skimming attack , whereby cybercriminals concealed malware on ecommerce sites that would steal information typed into the payment input fields, including customers' names, address and card details.
The Finnish government has allocated €20.7m to the venture, which will be run as an innovation partnership open to international bidding. Closer to home, VTT-TRCF plans to cooperate with Finnish companies across the IT and industrial sphere during the various phases of the project’s implementation and application. The rapid advances in quantum technology and computing have the potential to provide societies with the tools to overcome major future problems and challenges, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, that remain out of the reach of contemporary supercomputers. Quantum technologies have the potential to complete complex calculations, which currently take days to do, orders of magnitude quicker. Making calculations that traditional computers are fundamentally unable to do, if practical, they would mark a leap forward in computing capability far greater than that from the abacus to a modern computer. Antti Vasara, the CEO of VTT-TRCF said: “The quantum computers of the future will be able to accurately model viruses and pharmaceuticals, or design new materials in a way that is impossible with traditional methods.”
Simply installing an ECM system will not yield a secure content ecosystem. If there is one thing that all ECM experts agree on, it's installing an ECM system will accomplish nothing aside from consuming resources. People need to use the system to manage content -- and want to use it -- even after setting up the necessary security controls to meet the requirements of the CCPA. Deploying an ECM system that is so secure that people do not want to use it is a waste of resources. The ECM system does not need to be complicated. Setting up a secure desktop sync of content is an important first step in ease of use and adoption. Instead of just rolling it out, companies need to work with each group using the software first. The business must help users organize their content and set up a basic structure for storing content so that the system doesn't become disorganized. Depending on the system that a business is using, setting up a basic structure may include a basic taxonomy, content types, standard metadata or a combination of any of these. If a business implements its ECM system correctly, its largest challenge will be securing mobile devices and laptops.
Covid-19 has revealed the weaknesses of global supply chains with countless reports of PPE issues, a lack of food in impoverished areas, and a breakdown of business-as-normal, even in places where demand has remained constant. Trust has always been the keystone of trade. But how can you trust supply chain partners to deliver in times of widespread failure? Owing to its decentralised nature, blockchain-based applications create a transparent ecosystem when you trust — and see — that the mechanisms in place are fair to all. It can provide instant overviews of entire supply chains to highlight issues as soon as they arrive. What’s more, it is possible to implement live failsafes with smart contracts that can ensure the smooth continuation of the supply chain and remove the very need for trust in the first place. To this end, the World Economic Forum developed the Blockchain Deployment Toolkit, a set of high-level guidelines to help companies implement best practices across blockchain projects – especially those helping solve supply chain issues. They worked with more than 100 organisations for more than a year, delving into 40 different blockchain use cases, including traceability and automation, to help guide organisations in their efforts to solve real-world problems with blockchain.
“Technology has absolutely been at the forefront of all the changes we have seen and will see in upcoming years,” explained Rao. Even so, the business of banking has not changed on a fundamental level. Rather, products have become more commoditized; similar business products are being offered, but customers are using them in different ways. In Rao’s words, “the ‘what’ component has not changed, but the ‘how’ has.” This is where digitization has had the biggest impact. For example, commercial banking capabilities like making a payment or collecting a receivable have long been available for corporate entities. But today, the same capability can be offered in a way that emphasizes a great user experience—something that hasn’t always been a focal area in the commercial banking space. ... Large traditional banks are frequently riddled with outdated legacy systems on the back end of operations, which dilutes their offerings even with modern digital technology at the front end. These legacy systems make it costly to create the ideal customer experience, leading many banks to focus on implementing strategies that pave the path towards modernization. In certain cases, this means opening up and modernizing selective pieces of back-end systems to improve operations overall.
Quote for the day: