Quote for the day:
"Listen with curiosity, speak with
honesty act with integrity." -- Roy T Bennett

Regulatory and compliance concerns are a big driver toward the private cloud or
on-premises solutions, says Bastien Aerni, vice president of strategy and
technology adoption at GTT. Many companies are shifting their sensitive
workloads to private clouds as a piece of broader multicloud and hybrid
strategies to support agentic AI and other complex AI initiatives, he adds.
“Most of the time, AI is touching confidential data or business-critical data,”
Aerni says. “Then the thinking about the architecture and what the workload
should be public vs. private, or even on-prem, is becoming a true question.” The
public cloud still provides maximum scalability for AI projects, and in recent
years, CIOs have been persuaded by the number of extra capabilities available
there, he says. “In some of the conversations I had with CIOs, let’s say five
years ago, they were mentioning, ‘There are so many features, so many tools,’”
Aerni adds. ... “The paradox is clear: AI workloads are driving both
massive cloud growth and selective repatriation simultaneously, because the
market is expanding so rapidly it’s accommodating multiple deployment models at
once,” Kirschner says. “What we are seeing is the maturation from a naive
‘everything-to-the-cloud’ strategy toward intelligent, workload-specific
decisions.”
At first glance, DPDP appears to mirror other data privacy frameworks like GDPR
or CCPA. There’s talk of consent, purpose limitation, secure storage, and rights
of the data principal (i.e., the individual). But the Indian legislation’s
implications ripple far beyond IT configurations or privacy policies. “Mention
data protection, and it often gets handed off to the legal or IT teams,” says
Gupta. “But that misses the point. Every team that touches personal data is
responsible under this law.” For HR departments, this shift is seismic. Gupta
underscores how HR sits atop a “goldmine” of personal information—addresses,
Aadhaar numbers, medical history, performance reviews, family details, even
biometric data in some cases. And this isn't limited to employees; applicants
and former workers are also in scope. ... With India housing thousands of global
capability centres and outsourcing hubs, DPDP challenges multinationals to look
inward. The emphasis so far has been on protecting customer data under global
laws like GDPR. But now, internal data practices—especially around employees—are
under the scanner. “DPDP is turning the lens inward,” says Gupta. “If your GCC
in India tightens data practices, it won’t make sense to be lax elsewhere.”

Traditional data stacks optimized for analytics, for the most part, don’t
naturally support the vector search and semantic retrieval patterns that GenAI
applications require. Thus, real-time GenAI data architectures need native
support for embedding generation and vector storage as first-class citizens.
This could mean integrating data with vector databases like Pinecone,
Weaviate, or Chroma as part of the core infrastructure. It may also mean
searching for multi-modal databases that can support all of your required data
types out of the box without needing a bunch of separate platforms. Regardless
of the underlying infrastructure, plan for needing hybrid search capabilities
that combine traditional keyword search with semantic similarity, and consider
how you’ll handle embedding model updates and re-indexing. ... Maintaining
data relationships and ensuring consistent access patterns across these
different storage systems is the real challenge when working with these
various data types. While some platforms are beginning to offer enhanced
vector search capabilities that can work across different data types, most
organizations still need to architect solutions that coordinate multiple
storage systems. The key is to design these multi-modal capabilities into your
data stack early, rather than trying to bolt them on later when your GenAI
applications demand richer data integration.

Digital transformation has reshaped the commercial world, integrating
technology into nearly every aspect of operations. That has brought incredible
opportunities, but it has also opened doors to new threats. Cyber attacks are
more frequent and sophisticated, with malevolent actors targeting everyone
from individuals to major corporations and entire countries. It is no
exaggeration to say that establishing, and maintaining, effective cyber
hygiene has become indispensable. According to Microsoft’s 2023 Digital
Defense Report, effective cyber hygiene could prevent 99% of cyber attacks.
Yet cyber hygiene is not just about preventing attacks, it is also central to
maintaining operational stability and resilience in the event of a cyber
breach. In that event robust cyber hygiene can limit the operational,
financial, and reputational impact of a cyber attack, thereby enhancing an
entity’s overall risk profile. ... Even though it’s critical, data suggests
that many organizations struggle to implement even basic cyber security
measures effectively. For example, a 2024 survey by Extrahop, a Seattle-based
cyber security services provider, found that over half of the respondents
admitted to using at least one unsecured network protocol, making them
susceptible to attacks.

Data engineers are already overworked. Weigel cited a study that indicated 80%
of data engineering teams are already overloaded. But when you add AI and
unstructured data to the mix, the workload issue becomes even more acute.
Agentic AI provides a potential solution. It’s natural that overworked data
engineering teams will turn to AI for help. There’s a bevy of providers
building copilots and swarms of AI agents that, ostensibly, can build, deploy,
monitor, and fix data pipelines when they break. We are already seeing agentic
AI have real impacts on data engineering teams, as well as the downstream data
analysts who ultimately are the ones requesting the data in the first place.
... Once human data engineers are out of the loop, bad things can start
happening, Weigel said. They potentially face a situation where the volume of
data requests–which originally were served by human data engineers but now are
being served by AI agents–is beyond their capability to keep up. ... “We’re
now back in the dark ages, where we were 10 years ago [when we wondered] why
we need data warehouses,” he said. “I know that if person A, B, and C ask a
question, and previously they wrote their own queries, they got different
results. Right now, we ask the same agent the same question, and because
they’re non-deterministic, they will actually create different queries every
time you ask it.
Security teams are using AI to keep up with the pace of AI-powered cybercrime,
scanning large volumes of data to surface threats earlier. AI helps scan
massive amounts of threat data, surface patterns, and prioritize
investigations. For example, analysts used AI to uncover a threat actor’s
alternate Telegram channels, saving significant manual effort. Another use
case: linking sockpuppet accounts. By analyzing slang, emojis, and writing
styles, AI can help uncover connections between fake personas, even when their
names and avatars are different. AI also flags when a new tactic starts
gaining traction on forums or social media. ... As more defenders turn to AI
to make sense of vast amounts of threat data, it’s easy to assume that LLMs
can handle everything on their own. But interpreting chatter from the
underground is not something AI can do well without help. “This diffuse
environment, rich in vernacular and slang, poses a hurdle for LLMs that are
typically trained on more generic or public internet data,” Ian Gray, VP of
Cyber Threat Intelligence at Flashpoint, told Help Net Security. The problem
goes deeper than just slang. Threat actors often communicate across multiple
niche platforms, each with its own shorthand and tone.

The allure of AI is undeniable. It drafts emails, summarizes lengthy reports,
generates code snippets, and even whips up images faster than you can say
“neural network.” This unprecedented convenience, however, carries a subtle
but potent risk. A study from MIT has highlighted concerns that overuse of AI
tools might be degrading our thinking capabilities. That degradation is the
digital equivalent of using a GPS so much that you forget how to read a map.
Suddenly, your internal compass points vaguely toward convenience and not much
else. When we offload critical cognitive tasks entirely to AI, our muscles for
those tasks can begin to atrophy, leading to cognitive offloading. ... Treat
AI-generated content like a highly caffeinated first draft — full of energy
but possibly a little messy and prone to making things up. Your job isn’t to
simply hit “generate” and walk away, unless you enjoy explaining AI
hallucinations or factual inaccuracies to your boss. Or worse, your audience.
Always, always, aggressively edit, proofread, and, most critically, fact-check
every single output. ... The real risk isn’t AI taking over our jobs;
it’s us letting AI take over our brains. To maintain your analytical edge,
continuously challenge yourself. Practice skills that AI complements but
doesn’t replace, such as critical thinking, complex problem-solving, nuanced
synthesis, ethical judgment, and genuine human creativity.
In today’s BFSI landscape, technology alone is no longer a differentiator. True
competitive advantage lies in the orchestration of innovation with governance.
The deployment of AI in underwriting, the migration of customer data to the
cloud, or the use of IoT in insurance all bring immense opportunity—but also
profound risks. Without strong guardrails, these initiatives can expose firms to
cyber threats, data sovereignty violations, and regulatory scrutiny. Innovation
without governance is a gamble; governance without innovation is a graveyard.
... In cloud transformation projects, for instance, we work with clients to
proactively assess data localisation risks, cloud governance maturity, and
third-party exposures, ensuring resilience is designed from day one. As AI
adoption scales across financial services, we bring deep expertise in
Responsible AI governance. From ethical frameworks and model explainability to
regulatory alignment with India’s DPDP Act and the EU AI Act, our solutions
ensure that automated systems remain transparent, auditable, and trustworthy.
Our AI risk models integrate regulatory logic into system design, bridging the
gap between innovation and accountability.

Cybercriminals are tailoring AI models for specific fraud schemes, including
generating phishing emails tailored by sector or language, as well as writing
fake job posts, invoices, or verification prompts. “Some vendors even market
these tools with tiered pricing, API access, and private key licensing,
mirroring the [legitimate] SaaS economy,” Flashpoint researchers found. “This
specialization leads to potentially greater success rates and automated complex
attack stages,” Flashpoint’s Gray tells CSO. ... Cybercrime vendors are also
lowering the barrier for creating synthetic video and voice, with deepfake as a
service (DaaS) offerings ... “This ‘prompt engineering as a service’ (PEaaS)
lowers the barrier for entry, allowing a wider range of actors to leverage
sophisticated AI capabilities through pre-packaged malicious prompts,” Gray
warns. “Together, these trends create an adaptive threat: tailored models become
more potent when refined with illicit data, PEaaS expands the reach of threat
actors, and the continuous refinement ensures constant evolution against
defenses,” he says. ... Enterprises need to balance automation with expert
analysis, separating hype from reality, and continuously adapt to the rapidly
evolving threat landscape. “Defenders should start by viewing AI as an
augmentation of human expertise, not a replacement,” Flashpoint’s Gray
says.
If DevOps and platform engineering needed a common enemy — or ally — to bond
over, AI provided it. A panel featuring Nvidia, Google, Rootly and Thoughtworks
explained how large language models are automating “the last mile” of toil, from
incident response bots that reason over Grafana dashboards to code-gen pipelines
that spit out compliant Terraform. ... The logic is straightforward: You can’t
automate what you can’t see. For DevOps practitioners, high-fidelity telemetry
is now table stakes — whether you’re feeding an agentic AI, debugging an
ephemeral sandbox, or proving compliance to auditors. Expect platform blueprints
to ship with observability baked in, not bolted on. Look at the badges behind
every coffee urn and you’ll spot familiar DevOps and DevSecOps logos — GitHub
Actions, Mezmo, Teleport, Cortex, Sedai, Tailscale. Many of these vendors cut
their teeth in CI/CD, IaC, or shift-left security long before “platform
engineering” was a LinkedIn hashtag. ... So why the funeral garb? My guess:
A tongue-in-cheek jab at hype cycles. Just as “DevOps is dead” clickbait pushed
us to sharpen our message, the sash was a reminder that real value — not
buzzwords — keeps a movement alive. Judging by the hallway traffic and workshop
queues, platform engineering is passing that test.