Daily Tech Digest by Kannan Subbiah: data engineering

Showing posts with label data engineering. Show all posts

Daily Tech Digest - July 23, 2026

Quote for the day:

“People will never forget how you made them feel.” -- Maya Angelou

🎧 Listen to the audio debrief on YouTube

Duration: 23 mins • Perfect for listening on the go.

Seven sins of the modern software developer

The article takes a candid look at how modern developers are bending long‑standing engineering norms now that large language models and agentic IDEs can generate, fix, and scaffold code with very little human effort. It frames these behaviors as “sins” not in a moral sense, but as habits that quietly erode craftsmanship. Developers increasingly skip foundational knowledge, assuming the AI will choose the right patterns or frameworks. Documentation is often ignored; instead, programmers paste entire stack traces into an AI chat and accept whatever fix it proposes. The piece notes that many developers no longer understand how their back ends are wired because they rely on AI‑generated scaffolding that “just sort of… ran it,” including security rules they never fully review . The article also highlights a growing detachment from architectural discipline: teams let AI handle data flows, deployment setups, and even language translation, turning engineers into “copy‑paste orchestrators” rather than deliberate designers. While the tone is humorous, the underlying message is serious: AI can accelerate development, but it can also tempt developers to abandon the practices that keep systems understandable, secure, and maintainable. The author urges readers to stay honest about these shortcuts and re‑anchor themselves in thoughtful engineering rather than letting convenience dictate their craft.

Shadow AI is becoming enterprise security’s biggest blind spot

Shadow AI, the article explains, has become one of the biggest blind spots in enterprise security because employees adopt AI tools far faster than organizations can govern them. As Help Net Security notes, workers now use AI to summarize documents, analyze spreadsheets, write code, and automate tasks, often without formal approval . These tools frequently slip in through everyday software updates or personal accounts, making them hard to detect or control. The real risk isn’t just unauthorized tools but unauthorized data movement — employees rarely stop to consider what information an AI feature might capture or where that data might be stored . Even companies with clear policies discover far more AI usage than expected once they start investigating. Attempts to block tools often fail because employees simply switch devices or use built‑in AI features already present in business applications. This creates a growing visibility gap: organizations may believe they have only a handful of sanctioned AI systems, while dozens operate quietly in the background. The article stresses that shadow AI is usually accidental, driven by convenience and deadlines rather than malice, but the security implications are serious. Without stronger governance, training, and monitoring, sensitive data can leak, compliance obligations can be breached, and AI‑driven workflows can evolve outside any formal oversight.

AI, security operations and the new race against time

The piece explains how AI is reshaping security operations by compressing the time defenders have to understand and respond to threats. Attackers are already using autonomous agents to scan networks, chain exploits, and move laterally at speeds that outpace human analysts. As the article notes, AI “changes the tempo of intrusion,” turning what used to be hours or days of attacker activity into minutes. This shift creates a new race against time: defenders must detect, interpret, and act before an automated adversary completes its workflow. Traditional SOC processes—manual triage, ticket queues, and human‑driven investigation—cannot keep up with this pace. The article argues that security teams need AI systems of their own, not as replacements for analysts but as tools that can summarize logs, correlate signals, and surface the most urgent issues quickly. It also stresses that automation must be paired with guardrails, since AI can generate false positives or misjudge context if left unchecked. The core message is that the advantage now goes to whichever side can act faster with the help of AI. Security operations must evolve from slow, linear processes to tightly orchestrated workflows where humans and machines work together to keep pace with automated threats.

Are data centers ready for ‘quantum in the cloud’?

The article examines whether today’s data centers are prepared to host quantum computers as cloud‑based services, noting that the shift from lab prototypes to production‑grade systems requires a different level of engineering maturity. Quantum‑Computing‑as‑a‑Service is gaining momentum, with analysts projecting a market of up to $26 billion by 2030 . But most quantum machines are still fragile, research‑grade devices that demand specialized cooling, careful calibration, and hands‑on maintenance. To operate them reliably in a cloud environment, vendors must redesign hardware to be more compact, modular, and serviceable — including hot‑swappable components, standardized rack formats, and elimination of single points of failure. The article also highlights early deployments, such as Oxford Quantum Computing installing multiple quantum processing units directly in colocation facilities to ensure uptime and meet customer requirements for low‑latency access and data‑sovereignty constraints . These examples show that quantum systems can coexist with traditional data‑center infrastructure, but only with significant adaptation on both sides. Overall, the piece conveys calm realism: quantum in the cloud is coming, major providers are investing, and the potential value is high — but widespread readiness depends on engineering quantum machines to behave like dependable data‑center resources rather than delicate laboratory instruments.

From outsourcing to ownership: How we brought development in-house without breaking delivery

The article describes how one company shifted from outsourced development to an in‑house model without slowing delivery, emphasizing that the change required discipline rather than dramatic reinvention. The team had relied on vendors for years, which created predictable patterns: long handoffs, limited architectural control, and a growing gap between what the business needed and what external teams could deliver. Bringing development back inside the organization meant rebuilding core practices — ownership of code, clearer product direction, and tighter collaboration between engineering and business teams. The author explains that success came from starting small, choosing a few critical products, and pairing internal engineers with existing vendor teams so knowledge transfer happened gradually instead of abruptly. They focused on predictable delivery, stable architecture, and reducing dependency on external decision‑making. Over time, internal teams became confident enough to take full ownership, and delivery speed improved because decisions no longer required external negotiation. The article stresses that the goal was not to eliminate vendors entirely but to ensure the company controlled its most important systems. The overall message is calm and practical: insourcing works when it is done deliberately, with clear priorities, steady capability building, and a willingness to reshape processes rather than rushing toward independence.

Data protection, digital trust and AI: Building the foundations of India’s next growth story

The article argues that India’s next phase of digital growth depends on treating data protection, digital trust, and responsible AI as core foundations rather than afterthoughts. It explains that India’s privacy journey, which began with the 2017 Puttaswamy judgment, has matured into a full regulatory framework through the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, and the DPDP Rules, 2025. These laws shift organizations from policy anticipation to operational readiness, requiring consent management, retention controls, breach‑response processes, and privacy‑by‑design to be built directly into everyday decision‑making. The authors note that this framework places individuals at the center of the digital ecosystem, giving citizens clearer rights over how their data is collected, used, and erased. Penalties of up to ₹250 crore for inadequate safeguards underscore the seriousness of compliance. The article also highlights how India’s digital public infrastructure — including platforms like DigiLocker — shows what trusted, identity‑linked services can achieve at national scale. Overall, the piece presents data protection as a strategic business priority that strengthens trust, accountability, and resilience. It argues that as AI adoption accelerates, India’s growth story will depend on embedding strong governance and transparent data practices so innovation and public confidence advance together.

AI agents aren't confidently wrong because of bad context — they're wrong because of bad data engineering

The article argues that AI agents often fail not because they misunderstand context, but because the underlying data engineering is flawed. It explains that many organizations rush to build agentic systems on top of messy pipelines, outdated schemas, and brittle integrations. When an agent receives incomplete, duplicated, or poorly labeled data, it produces confident but incorrect actions — not because the model is reckless, but because the foundation beneath it is unreliable. The author notes that teams frequently blame “bad prompts” or “missing context,” when the real issue is that their data flows were never designed for autonomous decision‑making. Agents depend on clean event streams, consistent identifiers, and predictable structures, yet most enterprise systems still contain silent failures: stale tables, broken joins, untracked edge cases, and logic scattered across legacy services. The piece stresses that traditional analytics can tolerate these imperfections, but autonomous systems cannot. To make agents dependable, organizations must treat data engineering as a first‑order discipline — validating inputs, enforcing contracts, instrumenting pipelines, and eliminating ambiguity before the agent ever sees the data. The core message is calm and practical: agents are only as reliable as the plumbing beneath them, and fixing that plumbing is the real work of making AI trustworthy.

AI Agents Force CRM Vendors to Rethink Their Platforms

The article explains how AI agents are pushing CRM vendors to rethink how their platforms are built and what they should actually do for customers. Traditional CRM systems were designed around static workflows, manual data entry, and rule‑based automation. But AI agents can now take on full segments of the sales cycle — identifying leads, drafting outreach, updating records, and coordinating follow‑ups — without waiting for human input at every step. This shift forces CRM vendors to reconsider long‑standing assumptions about how their products should function. Instead of serving as passive databases, CRMs must become environments where autonomous agents can operate safely, consistently, and with clear guardrails. That means better data quality, stronger integration layers, and architectures that support goal‑driven decision‑making rather than simple triggers. The article also notes that AI agents reduce the burden on sales teams by eliminating much of the repetitive work that once made CRM upkeep a chore. As a result, vendors must design platforms that are more flexible, more transparent, and more capable of handling autonomous workflows. The core message is steady and practical: AI agents aren’t just an add‑on feature — they fundamentally change what a CRM needs to be, and vendors who adapt will shape the next generation of customer‑management tools.

When Identity Verification Fails: Lessons from a Real-World SIM Swap and Near Account Takeover

The article recounts a real SIM‑swap attack to show how identity verification can fail even when a company believes its controls are solid. The victim noticed his phone suddenly losing service — the first sign that an attacker had convinced the carrier to move his number to a different SIM. With that foothold, the attacker tried to reset passwords and access financial accounts, relying on the fact that many services still treat SMS messages as proof of identity. What stopped the takeover was not a single safeguard but a mix of luck, quick action, and stronger authentication on a few key accounts. The investigation revealed how easily social‑engineering can bypass call‑center procedures, especially when staff rely on superficial checks or feel pressured to resolve customer issues quickly. It also showed how attackers chain small weaknesses: outdated recovery paths, over‑reliance on phone numbers, and inconsistent use of multifactor authentication. The article’s tone is steady and cautionary. It argues that organizations must treat identity verification as a security control, not a customer‑service formality. That means reducing dependence on SMS, tightening recovery workflows, and training support teams to recognize manipulation. The broader lesson is simple: identity failures rarely come from one big mistake — they come from many small ones lining up at the wrong moment.

10 cool things Copilot can do in PowerPoint

The article walks through ten practical ways Copilot can make working in PowerPoint easier, focusing on everyday tasks rather than flashy tricks. It explains that Copilot can turn a rough outline into a clean, structured deck, saving time on the initial setup. It can also rewrite slide text to be clearer or more concise, adjust tone, and help reduce clutter without changing the core message. For visuals, Copilot can generate images, suggest layouts, and reorganize content so slides look more polished with less manual tweaking. The article notes that Copilot can summarize long documents into a few slides, which is useful when preparing executive updates or briefing materials. It can also create speaker notes, build sample timelines, and help reshape dense data into simpler charts. Another helpful feature is the ability to restyle an entire deck to match a theme or brand without reformatting each slide. Throughout the piece, the tone is steady: Copilot doesn’t replace thoughtful presentation design, but it removes much of the repetitive work that slows people down. The overall message is that Copilot acts as a quiet assistant — one that helps users start faster, clean up slides more easily, and focus on the parts of a presentation that actually require human judgment.

Daily Tech Digest - July 18, 2026

Quote for the day:

“Train people well enough so they can leave. Treat them well enough so they don’t want to.” -- Richard Branson

🎧 Listen to this digest on YouTube Music

▶ Play Audio Digest

Duration: 25 mins • Perfect for listening on the go.

How to add XLAs to your outsourcing contract

Integrating Experience Level Agreements into your outsourcing contracts requires clear responsibilities and a structured approach to prevent the model from becoming merely a reporting exercise. For a successful partnership, customers should manage the data infrastructure and openly share experience data, while vendors handle measurement, monthly reporting, and execution of operational improvements. Rather than relying on simple snapshots, officially calculate experience scores using a rolling average of two months to provide a stable view of trends and discourage vendors from gaming the system. A strong contract mandates formal reviews every three to six months to recalibrate targets and align with business priorities. It should also outline clear escalation procedures, including joint reviews, root cause analysis, and remediation timelines when scores dip below agreed thresholds. Organizations commonly fail by setting targets before establishing a baseline, measuring too many data points, hiding data, or relying too heavily on penalties instead of balanced incentives. The most successful implementations start simply rather than waiting for a perfect program. By agreeing on a focused set of experience metrics, taking the time to gather evidence first, committing to full data transparency, and creating shared accountability, companies can consistently drive meaningful outcomes in their outsourcing relationships.

The Data Engineering Landscape Is Shifting Fast. Here’s What Actually Matters

The data engineering field is evolving, but the core focus remains on building reliable systems. Instead of transforming information before storing it, teams now mostly store raw data first and organize it later using powerful cloud platforms. However, upfront transformation is still necessary for handling sensitive or regulated information. Storing data has also shifted; hybrid architectures that combine flexible storage with strict organization are now the standard, making it much easier for different systems to share information smoothly. Furthermore, processing data in real time is no longer a luxury but an absolute requirement, driven by the need for immediate insights and the demands of modern artificial intelligence. While artificial intelligence tools are excellent at automating routine maintenance and setup tasks, they cannot replace the human judgment needed to solve complex system failures or meet strict regulatory rules. Because systems are growing more complex, automated monitoring tools have become essential infrastructure rather than optional additions, ensuring errors are caught before they cause damage. Finally, organizations are moving away from relying on a single central data team, choosing instead to give individual departments ownership of their information. Ultimately, successful engineers focus on solving practical problems rather than blindly chasing the latest technological trends.

AI Didn’t Make Programming Easier. It Just Made It Differently Difficult

Artificial intelligence tools like Copilot and ChatGPT were widely expected to simplify programming, but instead, they have fundamentally shifted where the friction occurs in the software development process. Rather than spending countless hours writing repetitive boilerplate code or searching manuals for basic syntax, developers today must act more like senior code reviewers and system architects. The initial speed gained in automatically generating code is frequently offset by the additional time required to read, verify, and debug output that looks highly plausible but may contain subtle logic flaws or rely on entirely hallucinated functions. Consequently, the primary challenge of programming has moved away from basic typing mechanics and toward rigorous validation and precise problem definition. Engineers must now learn to write meticulously detailed instructions and possess a deep enough understanding of the broader system to spot errors that an automated assistant easily glosses over. This dynamic means less experienced developers can build functional prototypes much faster than before, but they face a significantly steeper learning curve when trying to diagnose complex integration issues. Ultimately, artificial intelligence has not eliminated the difficult work of software engineering; it has simply transformed it from manual creation into careful supervision, architectural planning, and structural testing.

4 shutdown risks that complicate legacy modernization

Replacing an outdated enterprise software system involves much more than simply selecting and installing a modern replacement. When organizations attempt to retire their legacy platforms, they frequently encounter four major shutdown risks that can stall or complicate the entire modernization effort. First, legacy systems rarely operate in isolation. They are usually deeply embedded into the daily operations, which means IT teams must carefully identify and untangle complex system integrations to avoid disrupting other connected applications. Second, managing user access becomes a significant challenge. IT leaders must ensure the right employees maintain appropriate permissions during the transition, preventing unauthorized access while keeping legitimate workflows moving. Third, modernization often blurs the lines of accountability. Unclear ownership over specific data sets and internal processes can stall progress when responsibilities shift from the legacy environment to the new solution. Finally, companies must actively manage the human element, specifically deeply ingrained fallback habits. If an old system remains partially accessible, or if the modern platform requires a steep learning curve, employees will naturally revert to their familiar routines. This resistance to change slows user adoption and severely limits the return on investment. To successfully modernize, organizations must proactively resolve integrations, access, ownership, and fallback behaviors before permanently pulling the plug on legacy tools.

20 Ways To Turn Career Challenges Into Lasting Professional Growth

Unexpected career challenges often provide the most valuable lessons for long-term professional development. According to insights from various business leaders, navigating difficult situations forces individuals to adapt and refine their leadership approaches. For example, facing burnout or leading through a crisis can teach leaders to replace fear and micromanagement with empathy, compassion, and a steady focus on empowering others. Rapid growth often reveals the need to build strong operational systems and clear structures rather than simply reacting to daily chaos. Furthermore, leaders emphasize the importance of transparent communication, noting that acknowledging uncertainty builds more trust than offering false promises. Transitioning from an individual contributor to a leader requires a shift from simply providing answers to creating environments where others can learn and thrive. Other significant lessons include embracing rejection as a catalyst for change, taking time to respond thoughtfully rather than quickly, and accepting unexpected opportunities even when the timing feels inconvenient. Maintaining independent thinking and prioritizing client interests over immediate profits also emerged as crucial principles for building a credible, sustainable career. Ultimately, rather than derailing a career, unexpected setbacks and structural shifts can highlight blind spots, encouraging professionals to build resilient teams and cultivate lasting impact within their modern organizations.

CISO Personal Liability Fears Nearly Double as AI Governance Mandates Expand

For today's Chief Information Security Officers, the fear of being personally sued over a data breach has become a major source of stress. A recent report reveals that three quarters of these security leaders now worry about personal legal action, a significant jump from just last year. This anxiety stems from rapidly expanding job responsibilities without the necessary budget or staff to handle them. For instance, nearly all security chiefs are now responsible for managing the risks associated with artificial intelligence across their companies. At the same time, they are dealing with exhausted teams; nearly two thirds of security staff report feeling burned out from an overwhelming number of daily system alerts. While artificial intelligence offers tools to help process these alerts faster, it also creates new problems. Security leaders note that AI makes deceptive attacks much more sophisticated and can sometimes generate false security alerts. Despite this new technology, almost all leaders agree that hiring and training people remains the most important solution, as automated tools cannot replace human judgment. To protect themselves and their organizations, security chiefs are advised to put clear rules in writing before rolling out new AI systems, dedicate specific teams to monitor these tools, and treat staff exhaustion as a serious corporate risk.

The SaaS blind spot: Why security teams can’t get inside their own apps

Many organizations invest heavily in cloud security tools to protect their infrastructure, yet they suffer from a massive blind spot regarding their everyday software applications. While companies typically rely on hundreds of these connected programs, security teams often only have direct visibility into a tiny fraction of them. Traditional tools are built to monitor the underlying network infrastructure, leaving security teams completely unable to see inside the applications to track user permissions, external sharing settings, or third-party connections. This widespread lack of visibility has led to severe data exposures, such as misconfigured guest profiles, stolen connection tokens, and exposed internal access passes at major tech companies. These quiet misconfigurations allow sensitive information to leak undetected, often for years, without triggering typical security alerts. To address this growing gap, organizations must bring these everyday applications into their core security perimeter. Before investing in specialized new platforms, security teams can take immediate, practical action by auditing connected third-party tools, revoking unnecessary access, reviewing external sharing permissions, and establishing quarterly access reviews for high-privilege accounts. Simply understanding what sensitive data lives in these applications and exactly who has the rights to access it is a vital first step toward closing this gap.

Rethinking Digital Sovereignty: What SaaS, Cloud, and AI Customers Should Be Asking Providers Now

Organizations navigating the complexities of modern software, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence must update their approach to digital sovereignty. For years, companies in regulated industries focused almost entirely on data residency to comply with privacy rules like the General Data Protection Regulation and the Digital Operational Resilience Act. This meant simply ensuring that their servers were located in a specific geographic region. However, merely storing data in a specific location is no longer sufficient to maintain actual control. For example, a business storing information in Europe could still be affected by United States laws if it uses an American service provider. A complete approach to digital sovereignty now requires assessing several critical layers beyond where the data physically sits. Customers should closely examine operational control to determine who manages the underlying infrastructure and who holds administrative access to view or modify systems. Encryption key management is equally vital, as companies must know exactly who holds the keys and whether the provider can decrypt their data. Furthermore, organizations must account for the physical location of support engineers, third party vendor dependencies, data portability for easier transitions, and overall service resilience during potential geopolitical disruptions or new regulatory restrictions.

AI agents could make living off the land attacks ‘much more dangerous’, says CrowdStrike Field CTO

Cybercriminals have long used a tactic called "living off the land," where they quietly hijack a company's normal software tools to steal information without setting off alarms. Now, according to CrowdStrike's Field CTO for Europe, the growing use of artificial intelligence agents could make these quiet attacks far more severe. Unlike traditional tools that have limited reach, AI agents are often granted broad access across a company's entire technology network. If hackers compromise just one of these agents, they can theoretically reach any part of the system. Many organizations are rushing to adopt AI assistants and automated tools without fully understanding the security risks. Attackers are already taking advantage of this confusion to generate harmful commands, steal login details, and access sensitive data. The core problem is that most companies lack the ability to properly track what these AI tools are doing. Security systems designed to manage human user accounts are struggling to handle automated systems. In fact, many companies cannot easily tell if a network action was performed by a real person or an AI acting on their behalf. To protect themselves, organizations must carefully monitor network activity across multiple layers to clearly distinguish human actions from automated ones.

The Right Amount of Spec for Agentic Development

Artificial intelligence makes writing software incredibly fast and inexpensive, fundamentally changing the development process. Because creating the code is no longer the hardest part, the primary challenge is now defining exactly what the software must do and reliably verifying the results. Some developers argue that detailed planning is entirely obsolete, but giving an artificial intelligence vague instructions leads to endless, frustrating cycles of human correction. Conversely, writing exhaustive formal plans upfront remains entirely too slow and impractical for every situation. The most effective amount of planning depends entirely on the task at hand. Simple, independent projects might only need clear goals and a few examples. However, complex systems, especially those where multiple artificial intelligence programs interact, require strict rules and automated tests to prevent small errors from snowballing unnoticed. Furthermore, older planning documents must be removed once the actual code is written, because outdated text will easily confuse the system. Ultimately, established software practices focusing on quick feedback, clear boundaries, and small updates are more valuable than ever. Success now belongs to teams that understand precisely how much detail is needed for a specific task, ensuring they clearly define their expectations before letting the machine start building.

Daily Tech Digest - February 20, 2026

Quote for the day:

"Hold yourself responsible for a higher standard than anybody expects of you. Never excuse yourself." -- Henry Ward Beecher

From in-house CISO to consultant. What you need to know before making the leap

A growing number of CISOs are either moving into consulting roles or seriously considering it. The appeal is easy to see: more flexibility and quicker learning, alongside steady demand for experienced security leaders. Some of these professionals work as virtual CISOs (vCISOs), advising companies from a distance. Others operate as fractional CISOs, embedding into the organization one or two days a week. ... CISOs line up their first clients while they’re still employed. Otherwise, he says, it can take a long time to build momentum. And the pressure to make it work can quickly turn into panic. In that moment, security professionals may start “underpricing themselves because they need money immediately,” he says. Once rates are set out of desperation, they’re often hard to reset without straining the relationship. Other CISOs-turned-consultants also emphasize preparation. ... Many of the skills CISOs honed inside large organizations translate directly to the new consulting job, while others suddenly matter more than they ever did before. In addition to technical skills, it is often the practical ones that prove most valuable. The ability to prioritize — sharpened over years in a CISO role — becomes especially important in consulting. ... Crisis management is another essential skill. Paired with hands-on knowledge of cybersecurity processes and best practices, it gives former CISOs a real advantage as they move into consulting.

New phishing campaign tricks employees into bypassing Microsoft 365 MFA

The message purports to be about a corporate electronic funds payment, a document about salary bonuses, a voicemail, or contains some other lure. It also includes a code for ‘Secure Authorization’ that the user is asked to enter when they click on the link, which takes them to a real Microsoft Office 365 login page. Victims think the message is legitimate, because the login page is legitimate, so enter the code. But unknown to the victim, it’s actually the code for a device controlled by the threat actor. What the victim has done is issued an granting the hacker’s device access to their Microsoft account. From there, the hacker has access to everything the account allows the employee to use. Note that this isn’t about credential theft, although if the attacker wants credentials, they can be stolen. It’s about stealing the victim’s OAuth access and refresh tokens for persistent access to their Microsoft account, including to applications such as Outlook, Teams, and OneDrive. ... The main defense against the latest version of this attack is to restrict the applications users are allowed to connect to their account, he said. Microsoft provides enterprise administrators with the ability to allowlist specific applications that the user may authorize via OAuth. ... The easiest defense is to turn off the ability to add extra login devices to Office 365, unless it’s needed, he said. In addition, employees should also be continuously educated about the risks of unusual login requests, even if they come from a familiar system.

The 200ms latency: A developer’s guide to real-time personalization

The first hurdle every developer faces is the “.” How do you personalize for a user with no history or an anonymous session? Traditional collaborative filtering fails here because it relies on a sparse matrix of past interactions. If a user just landed on your site for the first time, that matrix is empty. To solve this within a 200ms budget, you cannot afford to query a massive data warehouse to look for demographic clusters. You need a strategy based on session vectors. We treat the user’s current session as a real-time stream. ... Another architectural flaw I frequently encounter is the dogmatic attempt to run everything in real-time. This is a recipe for cloud bill bankruptcy and latency spikes. You need a strict decision matrix to decide exactly what happens when the user hits “load.” We divide our strategy based on the “Head” and “Tail” of the distribution. ... Speed means nothing if the system breaks. In a distributed system, a 200ms timeout is a contract you make with the frontend. If your sophisticated AI model hangs and takes 2 seconds to return, the frontend spins and the user leaves. We implement strict circuit breakers and degraded modes. ... We are moving away from static, rule-based systems toward agentic architectures. In this new model, the system does not just recommend a static list of items. It actively constructs a user interface based on intent. This shift makes the 200ms limit even harder to hit. It requires a fundamental rethink of our data infrastructure.

Spec-Driven Development – Adoption at Enterprise Scale

Spec-Driven Development emerged as AI models began demonstrating sustained focus on complex tasks for extended periods of time. Operating in a continuous back-and-forth pattern, instructional interactions between humans and AI is not the best use of this capability. At the same time, allowing AI to operate independently for long periods risks significant deviation from intended outcomes. We need effective context engineering to ensure intent alignment in this scenario. SDD addresses this need by establishing a shared understanding with AI, with specs facilitating dialogue between humans and AI, rather than serving as instruction manuals. ... When senior engineers collaborate, communication is conversational, rather than one-way instructions. We achieve shared understanding through dialogue. That shared understanding defines what we build. SDD facilitates this same pattern between humans and AI agents, where agents help us think through solutions, challenge assumptions, and refine intent before diving into execution. ... Given this significant cultural dimension, treating SDD as a technical rollout leaves substantial value on the table. SDD adoption is an organizational capability to develop, not just a technical practice to install. Those who have lived through enterprise agile adoption will recognize the pattern. Tools and ceremonies are easy to install, but without the cultural shifts we risk "SpecFall" (the equivalent of "Scrumerfall").

Tech layoffs in 2026: Why skills matter more than experience in tech

The impact of is becoming visible as companies prioritise data science and machine learning skills over conventional IT roles. During decades, layoffs were typically associated with the economic recession or lack of revenue in companies. The difference between the present wave is the involvement of automation and strategic restructuring. Although automation has had beneficial impacts on increasing productivity, it implies that jobs that aim at routine and repetitive duties continue to be at risk. ... The traditional career trajectories based on experience or seniority are replaced by market needs of niche skills in machine learning, data engineering, cloud architecture, and product leadership. Employees whose skills have not increased are more exposed to displacement in the event of reorganisation of the companies. These developments explain why tech professionals must reskill to remain employable in an AI-driven industry. The tech labor force in India, which is also one of the largest in the world, is especially vulnerable to the change. ... The future of tech jobs in India 2026 will favour professionals who combine technical expertise with analytical and problem-solving skills. The layoffs in early 2026 explain why the technology industry is vulnerable to job losses because corporate interests can change rapidly. To individuals, it entails being future-ready through the development of skills that would be relevant in the industry direction, including AI integration, cybersecurity, cloud computing, and advanced analytics.

Secrets Management Failures in CI/CD Pipelines

are still the most entrenched security issue. API keys, access tokens and private certificates continue to live in the configuration files of the pipeline, shell scripts or application manifests. While the repository is private, security exposure is the result of only one misconfiguration or breached account. Once committed, secrets linger for months or even years, far outlasting the necessary rotation period. Another common failure is secret sprawl. accumulate credentials over time with no clear ownership. Old tokens remain active because nobody remembers which service depends on them. Thus, as the pipeline develops, secrets management becomes reactive rather than intentional, compromising the likelihood of exposing credentials. Over-permissioned credentials make things worse. ... Technology is not the reason for most secrets management failures; it’s people. Developers tend to copy and paste credentials when they’re trying to get to the bottom of some problem or other. They might even just bypass the security safeguards because things are tight against the wire. It’s pretty easy for nobody to keep absolutely on top of their security posture as your CI/CD pipelines evolve. It’s just exactly for this reason that a DevSecOps culture is important. It has got to be more than just the tools; it has got to be how we all work together to get the job done. Security teams must recognize that what is needed is to consider the CI/CD pipeline as production infrastructure, not some internal tool that can be altered ‘on the fly’.

Agentic AI systems don’t fail suddenly — they drift over time

As organizations move from experimentation to real operational deployment of agentic AI, a new category of risk is emerging — one that traditional AI evaluation, testing and governance practices often struggle to detect. ... Most enterprise AI governance practices evolved around a familiar mental model: a stateless model receives an input and produces an output. Risk is assessed by measuring accuracy, bias or robustness at the level of individual predictions. Agentic systems strain that model. The operational unit of risk is no longer a single prediction, but a behavioral pattern that emerges over time. An agent is not a single inference. It is a process that reasons across multiple steps, invokes tools and external services, retries or branches when needed, accumulates context over time and operates inside a changing environment. Because of that, the unit of failure is no longer a single output, but the sequence of decisions that leads to it. ... In real environments, degradation rarely begins with obviously incorrect outputs. It shows up in subtler ways, such as verification steps running less consistently, tools being used differently under ambiguity, retry behavior shifting or execution depth changing over time. ... Without operational evidence, governance tends to rely more on intent and design assumptions than on observed reality. That’s not a failure of governance so much as a missing layer. Policy defines what should happen, diagnostics help establish what is actually happening and controls depend on that evidence.

Prompt Control is the New Front Door of Application Security

Application security has always been built around a simple assumption: There is a front door. Traffic enters through known interfaces, authentication establishes identity, authorization constrains behavior, and controls downstream enforcement of policy. That model still exists, but our most recent research shows it no longer captures where risk actually concentrates in AI-driven systems. ... are where intent enters the system. They define not only what a user is asking, but how the model should reason, what context it should retain, and which safeguards it should attempt to bypass. That is why prompt layers now outrank traditional integration points as the most impactful area for both application security and delivery. ... Output moderation still matters, and our research shows it remains a meaningful concern. But its lower ranking is telling. Output controls catch problems after the system has already behaved badly. They are essential guardrails, not primary defenses. It’s always more efficient to stop the thief on the way in rather than try to catch him after the fact, and in the case of inference, it’s less costly because stopping on the ingress means no token processing costs incurred. ... Our second set of findings reinforces this point. Authentication and observability lead the methods organizations use to secure and deliver AI inference services, cited by 55% and 54% of respondents, respectively. This holds true across roles, with the exception of developers, who more often prioritize protection against sensitive data leaks.

The 'last-mile' data problem is stalling enterprise agentic AI — 'golden pipelines' aim to fix it

Traditional ETL tools like dbt or Fivetran prepare data for reporting: structured analytics and dashboards with stable schemas. AI applications need something different: preparing messy, evolving operational data for model inference in real-time. calls this distinction "inference integrity" versus "reporting integrity." Instead of treating data preparation as a separate discipline, golden pipelines integrate normalization directly into the AI application workflow, collapsing what typically requires 14 days of manual engineering into under an hour, the company says. Empromptu's "golden pipeline" approach is a way to accelerate data preparation and make sure that data is accurate. ... "Enterprise AI doesn't break at the model layer, it breaks when messy data meets real users," Shanea Leven, CEO and co-founder of Empromptu told VentureBeat in an exclusive interview. "Golden pipelines bring data ingestion, preparation and governance directly into the AI application workflow so teams can build systems that actually work in production." ... Golden pipelines target a specific deployment pattern: organizations building integrated AI applications where data preparation is currently a manual bottleneck between prototype and production. The approach makes less sense for teams that already have mature data engineering organizations with established ETL processes optimized for their specific domains, or for organizations building standalone AI models rather than integrated applications.

From installation to predictive maintenance: The new service backbone of AI data centers

bring together several shifts at once: much higher rack densities, more dynamic load profiles, new forms of cooling, and tighter integration between electrical and digital systems. A single misconfiguration in the power chain can have much wider consequences than would have been the case in a traditional facility. This is happening at a time when many operators struggle to recruit and retain experienced operations and maintenance staff. The personnel on site often have to cope with hybrid environments that combine legacy air-cooled rooms with liquid-ready zones, energy storage, and multiple software layers for control and monitoring. In such an environment, services are not a ‘nice to have’. ... As architectures become more intricate, human error remains one of the main residual risks. AI-ready infrastructures combine complex electrical designs, liquid cooling circuits, high-density rack layouts, and multiple software layers such as . Operating and maintaining such systems safely requires clear procedures and a high level of discipline. ... In an AI-driven era, service strategy is as important as the choice of UPS topology, cooling technology or energy storage. Commissioning, monitoring, maintenance, and training are not isolated activities. Together, they form a continuous backbone that supports the entire lifecycle of the data center. Well-designed service models help operators improve availability, optimise energy performance and make better use of the assets they already have.

Daily Tech Digest - July 26, 2025

Quote for the day:

"Small daily improvements over time lead to stunning results." -- Robin Sharma

Data Engineering in the Age of AI: Skills To Master Now

Streaming requires a new mindset. You must reason about event time compared to processing time, manage watermarking and windowing and guarantee exactly-once semantics even when things change midstream. These design patterns must be built into your pipelines from the beginning. ... Agentic AI stretches the typical data engineer’s streaming data skill set because it is no longer about a single model running in isolation. Today, we see networks of perception agents, reasoning agents and execution agents working together, each handling tasks and passing insights to the next in real time. If you know only how to schedule batch ETL jobs or deploy an inference server, you’re missing a core skill: how to build high-throughput, low-latency pipelines that keep these agents reliable and responsive in production. ... A single slow or broken stream can cause cascading failures in multiagent systems. Use schema registries, enforce data contracts and apply exactly-once semantics to maintain trust in your streaming infrastructure. ... Communication presents another challenge. Data scientists often discuss “precision” as a metric that data engineers must translate into reality. Implement evaluation scores like factual consistency checks, entity precision comparisons and human-in-the-loop review pipelines.

Anthropic unveils ‘auditing agents’ to test for AI misalignment

Anthropic said the first environment it developed tests an agent’s ability to complete an alignment audit for an intentionally misaligned model. For this test, the researchers brought the investigator agent to the environment and equipped it with similar tools that human teams use. The researchers instructed the agent to identify the root cause of the misalignment and determine the specific behaviors that were misaligned. According to the researchers, the investigator agent successfully found the root cause of the issues 10-13% of the time. Still, this performance improved to 42% “when using a super-agent approach that aggregates findings across multiple investigations.” ... The next step in most alignment audits is typically a behavioral evaluation, which determines whether the model consistently misbehaves in various settings. To test its evaluation agent, the researchers designed 10 models “given system prompt instructions to exhibit a specific behavior, such as excessive deference to the user.” They ran the agent five times per model and saw that the agent correctly finds and flags at least one quirk of the model. However, the agent sometimes failed to identify specific quirks consistently. It had trouble evaluating subtle quirks, such as self-promotion and research-sandbagging, as well as quirks that are difficult to elicit, like the Hardcode Test Cases quirk.

The agentic experience: Is MCP the right tool for your AI future?

As enterprises race to operationalize AI, the challenge isn't only about building and deploying large language models (LLMs), it's also about integrating them seamlessly into existing API ecosystems while maintaining enterprise level security, governance, and compliance. Apigee is committed to lead you in this journey. Apigee streamlines the integration of gen AI agents into applications by bolstering their security, scalability, and governance. While the Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a de facto method of integrating discrete APIs as tools, the journey of turning your APIs into these agentic tools is broader than a single protocol. This post highlights the critical role of your existing API programs in this evolution and how ... Leveraging MCP services across a network requires specific security constraints. Perhaps you would like to add authentication to your MCP server itself. Once you’ve authenticated calls to the MCP server you may want to authorize access to certain tools depending on the consuming application. You may want to provide first class observability information to track which tools are being used and by whom. Finally, you may want to ensure that whatever downstream APIs your MCP server is supplying tools for also has minimum guarantees of security like already outlined above

AI Innovation: 4 Steps For Enterprises To Gain Competitive Advantage

A skill is a single ability, such as the ability to write a message or analyze a spreadsheet and trigger actions from that analysis. An agent independently handles complex, multi-step processes to produce a measurable outcome. We recently announced an expanded network of Joule Agents to help foster autonomous collaboration across systems and lines of business. This includes out-of-the-box agents for HR, finance, supply chain, and other functions that companies can deploy quickly to help automate critical workflows. AI front-runners, such as Ericsson, Team Liquid, and Cirque du Soleil, also create customized agents that can tackle specific opportunities for process improvement. Now you can build them with Joule Studio, which provides a low-code workspace to help design, orchestrate, and manage custom agents using pre-defined skills, models, and data connections. This can give you the power to extend and tailor your agent network to your exact needs and business context. ... Another way to become an AI front-runner is to tackle fragmented tools and solutions by putting in place an open, interoperable ecosystem. After all, what good is an innovative AI tool if it runs into blockers when it encounters your other first- and third-party solutions?

Hard lessons from a chaotic transformation

The most difficult part of this transformation wasn’t the technology but getting people to collaborate in new ways, which required a greater focus on stakeholder alignment and change management. So my colleague first established a strong governance structure. A steering committee with leaders from key functions like IT, operations, finance, and merchandising met biweekly to review progress and resolve conflicts. This wasn’t a token committee, but a body with authority. If there were any issues with data exchange between marketing and supply chain, they were addressed and resolved during the meetings. By bringing all stakeholders together, we were also able to identify discrepancies early on. For example, when we discovered a new feature in the inventory system could slow down employee workflows, the operations manager reported it, and we immediately adjusted the rollout plan. Previously, such issues might not have been identified until after the full rollout and subsequent finger-pointing between IT and business departments. The next step was to focus on communication and culture. From previous failed projects, we knew that sending a few emails wasn’t enough, so we tried a more personal approach. We identified influential employees in each department and recruited them as change champions.

Benchmarks for AI in Software Engineering

HumanEval and SWE-bench have taken hold in the ML community, and yet, as indicated above, neither is necessarily reflective of LLMs’ competence in everyday software engineering tasks. I conjecture one of the reasons is the differences in points of view of the two communities! The ML community prefers large-scale, automatically scored benchmarks, as long as there is a “hill climbing” signal to improve LLMs. The business imperative for LLM makers to compete on popular leaderboards can relegate the broader user experience to a secondary concern. On the other hand, the software engineering community needs benchmarks that capture specific product experiences closely. Because curation is expensive, the scale of these benchmarks is sufficient only to get a reasonable offline signal for the decision at hand (A/B testing is always carried out before a launch). Such benchmarks may also require a complex setup to run, and sometimes are not automated in scoring; but these shortcomings can be acceptable considering a smaller scale. For exactly these reasons, these are not useful to the ML community. Much is lost due to these different points of view. It is an interesting question as to how these communities could collaborate to bridge the gap between scale and meaningfulness and create evals that work well for both communities.

Scientists Use Cryptography To Unlock Secrets of Quantum Advantage

When a quantum computer successfully handles a task that would be practically impossible for current computers, this achievement is referred to as quantum advantage. However, this advantage does not apply to all types of problems, which has led scientists to explore the precise conditions under which it can actually be achieved. While earlier research has outlined several conditions that might allow for quantum advantage, it has remained unclear whether those conditions are truly essential. To help clarify this, researchers at Kyoto University launched a study aimed at identifying both the necessary and sufficient conditions for achieving quantum advantage. Their method draws on tools from both quantum computing and cryptography, creating a bridge between two fields that are often viewed separately. ... “We were able to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions for quantum advantage by proving an equivalence between the existence of quantum advantage and the security of certain quantum cryptographic primitives,” says corresponding author Yuki Shirakawa. The results imply that when quantum advantage does not exist, then the security of almost all cryptographic primitives — previously believed to be secure — is broken. Importantly, these primitives are not limited to quantum cryptography but also include widely-used conventional cryptographic primitives as well as post-quantum ones that are rapidly evolving.

It’s time to stop letting our carbon fear kill tech progress

With increasing social and regulatory pressure, reluctance by a company to reveal emissions is ill-received. For example, in Europe the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) currently requires large businesses to publish their emissions and other sustainability datapoints. Opaque sustainability reporting undermines environmental commitments and distorts the reference points necessary for net zero progress. How can organisations work toward a low-carbon future when its measurement tools are incomplete or unreliable? The issue is particularly acute regarding Scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions often account for the largest share of a company’s carbon footprint and are those generated indirectly along the supply chain by a company’s vendors, including emissions from technology infrastructure like data centres. ... It sounds grim, but there is some cause for optimism. Most companies are in a better position than they were five years ago and acknowledge that their measurement capabilities have improved. We need to accelerate the momentum of this progress to ensure real action. Earth Overshoot Day is a reminder that climate reporting for the sake of accountability and compliance only covers the basics. The next step is to use emissions data as benchmarks for real-world progress.

Why Supply Chain Resilience Starts with a Common Data Language

Building resilience isn’t just about buying more tech, it’s about making data more trustworthy, shareable, and actionable. That’s where global data standards play a critical role. The most agile supply chains are built on a shared framework for identifying, capturing, and sharing data. When organizations use consistent product and location identifiers, such as GTINs (Global Trade Item Numbers) and GLNs (Global Location Numbers) respectively, they reduce ambiguity, improve traceability, and eliminate the need for manual data reconciliation. With a common data language in place, businesses can cut through the noise of siloed systems and make faster, more confident decisions. ... Companies further along in their digital transformation can also explore advanced data-sharing standards like EPCIS (Electronic Product Code Information Services) or RFID (radio frequency identification) tagging, particularly in high-volume or high-risk environments. These technologies offer even greater visibility at the item level, enhancing traceability and automation. And the benefits of this kind of visibility extend far beyond trade compliance. Companies that adopt global data standards are significantly more agile. In fact, 58% of companies with full standards adoption say they manage supply chain agility “very well” compared to just 14% among those with no plans to adopt standards, studies show.

Opinion: The AI bias problem hasn’t gone away you know

When we build autonomous systems and allow them to make decisions for us, we enter a strange world of ethical limbo. A self-driving car forced to make a similar decision to protect the driver or a pedestrian in a case of a potentially fatal crash will have much more time than a human to make its choice. But what factors influence that choice? ... It’s not just the AI systems shaping the narrative, raising some voices while quieting others. Organisations made up of ordinary flesh-and-blood people are doing it too. Irish cognitive scientist Abeba Birhane, a highly-regarded researcher of human behaviour, social systems and responsible and ethical artificial intelligence was asked to give a keynote recently for the AI for Good Global Summit. According to her own reports on Bluesky, a meeting was requested just hours before presenting her keynote: “I went through an intense negotiation with the organisers (for over an hour) where we went through my slides and had to remove anything that mentions ‘Palestine’ ‘Israel’ and replace ‘genocide’ with ‘war crimes’…and a slide that explains illegal data torrenting by Meta, I also had to remove. In the end, it was either remove everything that names names (Big Tech particularly) and remove logos, or cancel my talk.”

Daily Tech Digest - July 01, 2025

Quote for the day:

"Listen with curiosity, speak with honesty act with integrity." -- Roy T Bennett

CIOs rethink public cloud as AI strategies mature

Regulatory and compliance concerns are a big driver toward the private cloud or on-premises solutions, says Bastien Aerni, vice president of strategy and technology adoption at GTT. Many companies are shifting their sensitive workloads to private clouds as a piece of broader multicloud and hybrid strategies to support agentic AI and other complex AI initiatives, he adds. “Most of the time, AI is touching confidential data or business-critical data,” Aerni says. “Then the thinking about the architecture and what the workload should be public vs. private, or even on-prem, is becoming a true question.” The public cloud still provides maximum scalability for AI projects, and in recent years, CIOs have been persuaded by the number of extra capabilities available there, he says. “In some of the conversations I had with CIOs, let’s say five years ago, they were mentioning, ‘There are so many features, so many tools,’” Aerni adds. ... “The paradox is clear: AI workloads are driving both massive cloud growth and selective repatriation simultaneously, because the market is expanding so rapidly it’s accommodating multiple deployment models at once,” Kirschner says. “What we are seeing is the maturation from a naive ‘everything-to-the-cloud’ strategy toward intelligent, workload-specific decisions.”

India’s DPDP law puts HR under the microscope—Here’s why that’s a good thing

At first glance, DPDP appears to mirror other data privacy frameworks like GDPR or CCPA. There’s talk of consent, purpose limitation, secure storage, and rights of the data principal (i.e., the individual). But the Indian legislation’s implications ripple far beyond IT configurations or privacy policies. “Mention data protection, and it often gets handed off to the legal or IT teams,” says Gupta. “But that misses the point. Every team that touches personal data is responsible under this law.” For HR departments, this shift is seismic. Gupta underscores how HR sits atop a “goldmine” of personal information—addresses, Aadhaar numbers, medical history, performance reviews, family details, even biometric data in some cases. And this isn't limited to employees; applicants and former workers are also in scope. ... With India housing thousands of global capability centres and outsourcing hubs, DPDP challenges multinationals to look inward. The emphasis so far has been on protecting customer data under global laws like GDPR. But now, internal data practices—especially around employees—are under the scanner. “DPDP is turning the lens inward,” says Gupta. “If your GCC in India tightens data practices, it won’t make sense to be lax elsewhere.”

3 ways developers should rethink their data stack for GenAI success

Traditional data stacks optimized for analytics, for the most part, don’t naturally support the vector search and semantic retrieval patterns that GenAI applications require. Thus, real-time GenAI data architectures need native support for embedding generation and vector storage as first-class citizens. This could mean integrating data with vector databases like Pinecone, Weaviate, or Chroma as part of the core infrastructure. It may also mean searching for multi-modal databases that can support all of your required data types out of the box without needing a bunch of separate platforms. Regardless of the underlying infrastructure, plan for needing hybrid search capabilities that combine traditional keyword search with semantic similarity, and consider how you’ll handle embedding model updates and re-indexing. ... Maintaining data relationships and ensuring consistent access patterns across these different storage systems is the real challenge when working with these various data types. While some platforms are beginning to offer enhanced vector search capabilities that can work across different data types, most organizations still need to architect solutions that coordinate multiple storage systems. The key is to design these multi-modal capabilities into your data stack early, rather than trying to bolt them on later when your GenAI applications demand richer data integration.

Cyber Hygiene Protecting Your Digital and Financial Health

Digital transformation has reshaped the commercial world, integrating technology into nearly every aspect of operations. That has brought incredible opportunities, but it has also opened doors to new threats. Cyber attacks are more frequent and sophisticated, with malevolent actors targeting everyone from individuals to major corporations and entire countries. It is no exaggeration to say that establishing, and maintaining, effective cyber hygiene has become indispensable. According to Microsoft’s 2023 Digital Defense Report, effective cyber hygiene could prevent 99% of cyber attacks. Yet cyber hygiene is not just about preventing attacks, it is also central to maintaining operational stability and resilience in the event of a cyber breach. In that event robust cyber hygiene can limit the operational, financial, and reputational impact of a cyber attack, thereby enhancing an entity’s overall risk profile. ... Even though it’s critical, data suggests that many organizations struggle to implement even basic cyber security measures effectively. For example, a 2024 survey by Extrahop, a Seattle-based cyber security services provider, found that over half of the respondents admitted to using at least one unsecured network protocol, making them susceptible to attacks.

Are Data Engineers Sleepwalking Towards AI Catastrophe?

Data engineers are already overworked. Weigel cited a study that indicated 80% of data engineering teams are already overloaded. But when you add AI and unstructured data to the mix, the workload issue becomes even more acute. Agentic AI provides a potential solution. It’s natural that overworked data engineering teams will turn to AI for help. There’s a bevy of providers building copilots and swarms of AI agents that, ostensibly, can build, deploy, monitor, and fix data pipelines when they break. We are already seeing agentic AI have real impacts on data engineering teams, as well as the downstream data analysts who ultimately are the ones requesting the data in the first place. ... Once human data engineers are out of the loop, bad things can start happening, Weigel said. They potentially face a situation where the volume of data requests–which originally were served by human data engineers but now are being served by AI agents–is beyond their capability to keep up. ... “We’re now back in the dark ages, where we were 10 years ago [when we wondered] why we need data warehouses,” he said. “I know that if person A, B, and C ask a question, and previously they wrote their own queries, they got different results. Right now, we ask the same agent the same question, and because they’re non-deterministic, they will actually create different queries every time you ask it.

How cybercriminals are weaponizing AI and what CISOs should do about it

Security teams are using AI to keep up with the pace of AI-powered cybercrime, scanning large volumes of data to surface threats earlier. AI helps scan massive amounts of threat data, surface patterns, and prioritize investigations. For example, analysts used AI to uncover a threat actor’s alternate Telegram channels, saving significant manual effort. Another use case: linking sockpuppet accounts. By analyzing slang, emojis, and writing styles, AI can help uncover connections between fake personas, even when their names and avatars are different. AI also flags when a new tactic starts gaining traction on forums or social media. ... As more defenders turn to AI to make sense of vast amounts of threat data, it’s easy to assume that LLMs can handle everything on their own. But interpreting chatter from the underground is not something AI can do well without help. “This diffuse environment, rich in vernacular and slang, poses a hurdle for LLMs that are typically trained on more generic or public internet data,” Ian Gray, VP of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Flashpoint, told Help Net Security. The problem goes deeper than just slang. Threat actors often communicate across multiple niche platforms, each with its own shorthand and tone.

How To Keep AI From Making Us Stupid

The allure of AI is undeniable. It drafts emails, summarizes lengthy reports, generates code snippets, and even whips up images faster than you can say “neural network.” This unprecedented convenience, however, carries a subtle but potent risk. A study from MIT has highlighted concerns that overuse of AI tools might be degrading our thinking capabilities. That degradation is the digital equivalent of using a GPS so much that you forget how to read a map. Suddenly, your internal compass points vaguely toward convenience and not much else. When we offload critical cognitive tasks entirely to AI, our muscles for those tasks can begin to atrophy, leading to cognitive offloading. ... Treat AI-generated content like a highly caffeinated first draft — full of energy but possibly a little messy and prone to making things up. Your job isn’t to simply hit “generate” and walk away, unless you enjoy explaining AI hallucinations or factual inaccuracies to your boss. Or worse, your audience. Always, always, aggressively edit, proofread, and, most critically, fact-check every single output. ... The real risk isn’t AI taking over our jobs; it’s us letting AI take over our brains. To maintain your analytical edge, continuously challenge yourself. Practice skills that AI complements but doesn’t replace, such as critical thinking, complex problem-solving, nuanced synthesis, ethical judgment, and genuine human creativity.

Governance meets innovation: Protiviti’s strategy for secure, scalable growth in BFSI and beyond

In today’s BFSI landscape, technology alone is no longer a differentiator. True competitive advantage lies in the orchestration of innovation with governance. The deployment of AI in underwriting, the migration of customer data to the cloud, or the use of IoT in insurance all bring immense opportunity—but also profound risks. Without strong guardrails, these initiatives can expose firms to cyber threats, data sovereignty violations, and regulatory scrutiny. Innovation without governance is a gamble; governance without innovation is a graveyard. ... In cloud transformation projects, for instance, we work with clients to proactively assess data localisation risks, cloud governance maturity, and third-party exposures, ensuring resilience is designed from day one. As AI adoption scales across financial services, we bring deep expertise in Responsible AI governance. From ethical frameworks and model explainability to regulatory alignment with India’s DPDP Act and the EU AI Act, our solutions ensure that automated systems remain transparent, auditable, and trustworthy. Our AI risk models integrate regulatory logic into system design, bridging the gap between innovation and accountability.

Cybercriminals take malicious AI to the next level

Cybercriminals are tailoring AI models for specific fraud schemes, including generating phishing emails tailored by sector or language, as well as writing fake job posts, invoices, or verification prompts. “Some vendors even market these tools with tiered pricing, API access, and private key licensing, mirroring the [legitimate] SaaS economy,” Flashpoint researchers found. “This specialization leads to potentially greater success rates and automated complex attack stages,” Flashpoint’s Gray tells CSO. ... Cybercrime vendors are also lowering the barrier for creating synthetic video and voice, with deepfake as a service (DaaS) offerings ... “This ‘prompt engineering as a service’ (PEaaS) lowers the barrier for entry, allowing a wider range of actors to leverage sophisticated AI capabilities through pre-packaged malicious prompts,” Gray warns. “Together, these trends create an adaptive threat: tailored models become more potent when refined with illicit data, PEaaS expands the reach of threat actors, and the continuous refinement ensures constant evolution against defenses,” he says. ... Enterprises need to balance automation with expert analysis, separating hype from reality, and continuously adapt to the rapidly evolving threat landscape. “Defenders should start by viewing AI as an augmentation of human expertise, not a replacement,” Flashpoint’s Gray says.

“DevOps is Dead? Long Live DevOps-Powered Platforms”

If DevOps and platform engineering needed a common enemy — or ally — to bond over, AI provided it. A panel featuring Nvidia, Google, Rootly and Thoughtworks explained how large language models are automating “the last mile” of toil, from incident response bots that reason over Grafana dashboards to code-gen pipelines that spit out compliant Terraform. ... The logic is straightforward: You can’t automate what you can’t see. For DevOps practitioners, high-fidelity telemetry is now table stakes — whether you’re feeding an agentic AI, debugging an ephemeral sandbox, or proving compliance to auditors. Expect platform blueprints to ship with observability baked in, not bolted on. Look at the badges behind every coffee urn and you’ll spot familiar DevOps and DevSecOps logos — GitHub Actions, Mezmo, Teleport, Cortex, Sedai, Tailscale. Many of these vendors cut their teeth in CI/CD, IaC, or shift-left security long before “platform engineering” was a LinkedIn hashtag. ... So why the funeral garb? My guess: A tongue-in-cheek jab at hype cycles. Just as “DevOps is dead” clickbait pushed us to sharpen our message, the sash was a reminder that real value — not buzzwords — keeps a movement alive. Judging by the hallway traffic and workshop queues, platform engineering is passing that test.