Daily Tech Digest - December 16, 2024

What IT hiring looks like heading into 2025

AI isn’t replacing jobs so much as it is reshaping the nature of work, said Elizabeth Lascaze, a principal in Deloitte Consulting’s Human Capital practice. She, too, sees evidence that entry-level roles focused on tasks like note-taking or basic data analysis are declining as organizations seek more experienced workers for junior positions. “Today’s emerging roles require workers to quickly leverage data, generate insights, and solve problems,” she said, adding that those skilled in using AI, such as cybersecurity analysts applying AI for threat detection, will be highly sought after. Although the adoption of AI has led to some “growing pains,” many workers are actually excited about it, Lascaze said, with most employees believing it will create new jobs and enhance their careers. “Our survey found that just 24% of early career workers and 14% of tenured workers fear their jobs will be replaced by AI,” Lascaze said. “Tenured workers are more likely to lead organizational strategy, so they may prioritize AI’s potential to improve efficiency, sophistication, and work quality in existing roles rather than AI’s potential to eliminate certain positions. “These workers reported being slightly more focused on building AI fluency than early-career employees,” Lascaze said. 


The Future of AI (And Travel) Relies on Synthetic Data

Synthetic data enhances accuracy and fairness in AI models as organic data can be biased or unbalanced, leading to ML models failing to represent diverse populations accurately. With synthetic data, researchers can create datasets that more accurately reflect the demographics they intend to serve, thereby minimizing biases and improving overall model robustness. ... Synthetic data can be a double-edged sword. While it addresses data privacy and availability challenges, it can inadvertently carry or magnify biases embedded in the original dataset. When source data is flawed, those imperfections can cascade into the synthetic version, skewing results — a critical concern in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance, where precision and fairness are paramount. To counteract this, having a human in the loop is super important. While there’s a temptation to use synthetic data to fill in every gap for better accuracy and fairness, we understood that running synthetic searches for every flight combination possible globally for our price tracking and predictions feature could overwhelm our booking system and impact real travelers organically searching for flights. Synthetic data has limitations that go beyond bias. 


9 Cloud Service Adoption Trends

Most organizations are building modern cloud computing applications to enable greater scalability while reducing cost and consumption costs. They’re also more focused on the security and compliance of cloud systems and how providers are validating and ensuring data protection. “Their main focus is really around cost, but a second focus would be whether providers can meet or exceed their current compliance requirements,” says Will Milewski, SVP of cloud infrastructure and operations at content management solution provider Hyland. ... There’s a fundamental shift in cloud adoption patterns, driven largely by the emergence of AI and ML capabilities. Unlike previous cycles focused primarily on infrastructure migration, organizations are now having to balance traditional cloud ROI metrics with strategic technology bets, particularly around AI services. According to Kyle Campos, chief technology and product officer at cloud management platform provider CloudBolt Software, this evolution is being catalyzed by two major forces: First, cloud providers are aggressively pushing AI capabilities as key differentiators rather than competing on cost or basic services. Second, organizations are realizing that cloud strategy decisions today have more profound implications for future innovation capabilities than ever before.


We’ve come a long way from RPA: How AI agents are revolutionizing automation

As the AI ecosystem evolves, a significant shift is occurring toward vertical AI agents — highly specialized AI systems designed for specific industries or use cases. As Microsoft founder Bill Gates said in a recent blog post: “Agents are smarter. They’re proactive — capable of making suggestions before you ask for them. They accomplish tasks across applications. They improve over time because they remember your activities and recognize intent and patterns in your behavior. “ Unlike traditional software-as-a-service (SaaS) models, vertical AI agents do more than optimize existing workflows; they reimagine them entirely, bringing new possibilities to life. ... The most profound shift in the automation landscape is the transition from RPA to multi-agent AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making and collaboration. According to a recent Gartner survey, this shift will enable 15% of day-to-day work decisions to be made autonomously by 2028. These agents are evolving from simple tools into true collaborators, transforming enterprise workflows and systems. ... As AI agents progress from handling tasks to managing workflows and entire jobs, they face a compounding accuracy challenge. Each additional step introduces potential errors, multiplying and degrading overall performance. 


8 reasons why digital transformations still fail

“People got really excited about, ‘We’re going to transform,’” Woerner says, but she believes part of the problem lies with leaders who “didn’t have the discipline to make the hard choices early on” to get employee buy-in. Ranjit Varughse, CIO of automotive paint and equipment firm Wesco Group, agrees. “The first challenge is getting digital transformation buy-in from teams at the outset. People are creatures of habit, making many hesitant to change their existing systems and processes,” he says. “Without a clear change management strategy to get a team aligned, ERP implementations in particular can be slow, stall, or even fail entirely.” ... Digital transformation isn’t a technology problem, it’s about understanding how people actually work, not how we think they should work, Wei says. “At PropertySensor, we scrapped our first version after realizing real estate agents needed mobile-first solutions, not desktop dashboards,” he says. ... “People, process, and technology” is a common phrase technology leaders use when discussing the critical elements of a transformation. “But the real focus should be people, people, people,” echoes Megan Williams, vice president of global technology strategy and transformation at TransUnion.


How companies can address bias and privacy challenges in AI models

Companies understand that AI adoption is existential to their survival, with the winners of tomorrow being determined by their ability to harness AI effectively. Furthermore, they understand that their brand’s reputation is one of their most valuable assets. Missteps with AI—especially in mission-critical contexts (think of a trading algorithm going awol, a breach of user privacy, or a failure to meet safety standards)—can erode public trust and harm a company’s bottom line. This could have dire consequences. With a company’s competitiveness and potentially its very survival at stake, AI governance becomes a business imperative that they cannot afford to ignore. ... Certainly, we see a lot of activity from the government – both at the state and federal levels – which is creating a fragmented approach. We also see leading companies who understand that adopting AI is crucial to their future and want to move fast. They are not waiting for the regulatory environment to settle and are taking a leadership position in adopting responsible AI principles to safeguard their brand reputations. So, I believe companies will act intelligently out of self-interest to accelerate their AI initiatives and increase business returns. 


Ensuring AI Accountability Through Product Liability: The EU Approach and Why American Businesses Should Care

In terms of a substantive law regulating AI (which can be the basis of the causality presumption under the proposed AI Liability Directive), the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) entered into force on August 1, 2024, becoming the first comprehensive legal framework for AI globally. The AI Act applies to providers and developers of AI systems that are marketed or used within the EU (including free-to-use AI technology), regardless of whether those providers or developers are established in the EU or a separate country. The EU AI Act sets forth requirements and obligations for developers and deployers of AI systems in accordance with risk-based classification system and a tiered approach to governance, which are two of the most innovative features of the AI Act. The Act classifies AI applications into four risk categories: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and minimal or no risk. AI systems deemed to pose an unacceptable risk, such as those that violate fundamental rights, are outright banned. ... High-risk AI systems, which include areas such as health care, law enforcement, and critical infrastructure, will face stricter regulatory scrutiny and must comply with rigorous transparency, data governance, and safety protocols. 


Agentic AI is evolving into specialised assistants, enabling the workforce to focus on value-adding tasks

A structured discovery approach is required to identify high impact areas for AI adoption rather than siloed use-cases. Infosys Topaz comprises verticalised blueprints, industry catalogues and strategic AI value map analysis capabilities. We have created playbooks for industries that lay out a structured roadmap to embed and mature GenAI into core processes and operations and across the IT landscape. This includes the right use-cases across the value stream spanning operations, customer experience, research and development, etc. As part of our Responsible AI by Design approach, we implement robust technical and process guardrails to ensure privacy and security. These include impact assessments, audits, automated policy enforcement, monitoring tools, and runtime safeguards to filter inputs and outputs for generative AI. We also use red-teaming and advanced testing tools to identify vulnerabilities and fortify AI models. Additionally, we employ privacy-preserving techniques such as Homomorphic Encryption and Secure Multi-Party Computation to enhance the security and resilience of our AI solutions. ... AI-driven monitoring tools detect inefficiencies in IT infrastructure, leveraging predictive analytics and forecasting techniques to improve utilisation in real time.


Security leaders top 10 takeaways for 2024

One of the most significant new rules, which has received the lion’s share of press attention, is the ‘materiality’ component, or the need to report “material” cybersecurity incidents to the SEC within four business days of discovery. At issue is whether the incident led to significant risk to the organization and its shareholders. If so, it’s defined as material and must be reported within four days of this determination being made (not its initial discovery). “Materiality extends beyond quantitative losses, such as direct financial impacts, to include qualitative aspects, like reputational damage and operational disruptions,” he says. McGladrey says the SEC’s materiality guidance underscores the importance of investor protection in relation to cybersecurity events and, if in doubt, the safest path is reporting. “If a disclosure is uncertain, erring on the side of transparency safeguards shareholders,” he tells CSO. ... As a virtual or fractional CISO service, Sage has observed startups engaging vCISO services earlier, in pre-seed and Series A stage and, in some cases, before they’ve finalized their minimum viable product. “Small technology consulting and boutique software development groups are looking for ISO 27001 certifications to ensure they can continue serving their larger customers,” she tells CSO.


Emotional intelligence in IT management: Impact, challenges, and cultural differences

While delivering results is the primary goal of any leader, you can’t forget that you’re managing people, not machines. Emotional intelligence helps balance the need for productivity with fairness and empathy. One way to illustrate this balance is through handling difficult conversations about career moves. Managing a team of over 100 support specialists for several years gave me the opportunity to conduct an interesting experiment. Many employees tend to hide the fact that they are exploring job opportunities elsewhere until the last minute. This creates unnecessary tension and can lead to higher turnover. However, if a manager removes the stigma around job interviews and treats them as part of market research, it encourages open communication. ... Emotionally intelligent managers possess the ability to identify the core of a conflict without letting it escalate. Attempting to gather every single piece of information is not always helpful. Instead, managers should focus on resolving conflicts, as often the solution is already within the team. This does not mean conducting surveys or asking for feedback from each person, as delicate situations require a more refined approach. A manager should observe, analyze, and extract the most significant points quickly and intuitively, enabling conflict resolution before it grows into a larger issue.



Quote for the day:

“Things come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle” -- Abraham Lincoln

No comments:

Post a Comment