Daily Tech Digest by Kannan Subbiah: collaboration

Showing posts with label collaboration. Show all posts

Daily Tech Digest - February 11, 2026

Quote for the day:

"What you do has far greater impact than what you say." -- Stephen Covey

Predicting the future is easy — deciding what to do is the hard part

The prescriptive analysis assists in developing strategies to optimize operations, increase profitability, and reduce risks. Traditionally, linear and non-linear programming models are used for resource allocation, supply chain management, and portfolio optimization. ... In enterprise decision-making, both predictive and prescriptive analytics play an important role. Predictive analytics enables forecasting possible business outcomes, while prescriptive analytics uses these forecasts to create a strategy to maximize business profits. However, enterprises often fail to integrate these two analytics techniques in an effective way for their own benefit. ... The integration of AI agents in predictive and prescriptive analytics workflows has not been explored much by data science professionals. However, a consolidated AI agentic framework can be developed that makes integrated use of predictive and prescriptive analytics in a combined way. ... On implementing the AI agentic framework, the industries experienced better forecasts through efficient predictive analytics. On the other hand, prescriptive analytics helped businesses in making their workflows more adaptable. Despite this success, high computational costs and explainability still remain a major challenge. To overcome these setbacks, an enterprise can further invest in developing multi-modal predictive-prescriptive AI agents and neuro-symbolic agents.

Agile development might be 25 years old, but it’s withstood the test of time – and there’s still more to come in the age of AI

Key focus areas of the Agile Manifesto helped drastically simplify software development, Reynolds noted. By moving teams to smaller more regular releases, for example, this “shortened feedback loops” typically associated with Waterfall and improved flexibility throughout the development lifecycle. “That reduced risk made it easier to respond to customer and business needs, and genuinely improved software quality,” he told ITPro. “Smaller changes meant testing could happen continuously, rather than being bolted on at the end.” The longevity of Agile methodology is testament to its impact, and research shows it’s still highly popular. ... According to Kern, AI and Agile are “a match made in heaven” and the advent of the technology means this approach is no longer optional, albeit with a notable caveat. “You need it more than ever,” he said. “You can build so much more in less time, which can also magnify potential pitfalls if you’re not careful. The speed of delivery with AI can easily outpace feedback, but that’s an exciting opportunity, not a flaw.” Reynolds echoed those comments, noting that while Agile can be a force multiplier for teams, there are still risks – particularly with the influx of AI-generated code in software development. “Those gains are often offset downstream, creating more bugs, higher cloud costs, and greater security exposure. The real value comes when AI is extended beyond code creation into testing, quality assurance, and deployment,” he said.

CISOs must separate signal from noise as CVE volume soars

“While the number of vulnerabilities goes up, what really matters is which of these are going to be exploited,” Michael Roytman, co-founder and CTO of Empirical Security, tells CSO. “And that’s a different process. It does not depend on the number of vulnerabilities that are out there because sometimes an exploit is written before the CVE is even out there.” What FIRST’s forecast highlights instead is a growing signal-to-noise problem, one that strains already overburdened security teams and raises the stakes for prioritization, automation, and capacity planning rather than demanding that organizations patch more flaws exponentially. ... Despite the scale of the forecast, experts stress that vulnerability volume alone is a poor proxy for enterprise risk. “The risk to an enterprise is not directly related to the number of vulnerabilities released,” Empirical Security’s Roytman says. “It is a separate process.” ... For CISOs, the implication is that patching strategies are now more about scaling decision-making processes that were already under strain. ... The cybersecurity industry is not facing an explosion of exploitable weaknesses so much as an explosion of information. For CISOs, success in 2026 will depend less on reacting faster and more on deciding better — using automation and context to ensure that rising vulnerability counts do not translate into rising risk. “It hasn’t been a human-scale problem for some time now,” Roytman says.

Strengthening a modern retail cybersecurity strategy

Enterprises might declare robust cybersecurity strategies yet fail to adequately address the threats posed by complex supply chains and aggressive digital transformation efforts. To bridge this gap, at Groupe Rocher, we have chosen to integrate cybersecurity into the core business strategy, ensuring that security measures are not only reactive but also predictive, leveraging threat intelligence to anticipate and mitigate risks effectively. ... It’s also important to remember that vulnerabilities aren’t always about technology. Often, they come from poor practices, like using weak passwords, having too much access, or not using multi-factor authentication (MFA). Criminals might use phishing or social engineering attacks to steal access from their victims. ... Additionally, fostering open communication and collaboration with vendors can help identify potential vulnerabilities early. We regularly organize workshops and joint security drills that can enhance mutual understanding and preparedness. By building strong partnerships and emphasizing shared security goals, brands can create a resilient network that not only protects their interests but also strengthens the entire ecosystem against evolving threats. ... As both regulators and consumers become less accepting of business models that prioritize data above all else, retail and beauty brands need to change how they protect data, focusing more on privacy and transparency.

OT Attacks Get Scary With 'Living-off-the-Plant' Techniques

For a number of reasons, ransomware against IT is affecting OT," Derbyshire explains. "This can occur due to, for example, convergences within the IT environment, that the OT simply cannot function without relying upon. Or a complete lack of trust in security controls or network architecture from the IT or OT security teams, so they voluntarily shut down the OT systems or sever the connection to kind of prevent the spread [of an IT attack]. Colonial Pipeline style. ... With a holistic understanding of how OT works, and knowledge of how a given OT site works, suddenly new threat vectors come into focus, which can blend with operational systems as elegantly as LotL attacks do Windows or Linux systems. For instance, Derbyshire plans to demonstrate at RSAC how an attacker can weaponize S7comm, Siemens' proprietary protocol for communication between programmable logic controllers (PLCs). He'll show how, by manipulating frequently overlooked configuration fields in S7comm, an attacker could potentially leak sensitive data and transmit attacks across devices. He calls it "an absolute brain melter." ... there are plenty of resources attackers can turn to to understand OT products better, be they textbooks, chatbots, or even just buying a PLC on a secondhand marketplace. "It still takes a bit of investment or a bit of time going out of your way to find these obscure things. But it's never been impossible and it's only getting easier," Derbyshire says.

The missing layer between agent connectivity and true collaboration

Today's AI challenge is about agent coordination, context, and collaboration. How do you enable them to truly think together, with all the contextual understanding, negotiation, and shared purpose that entails? It's a critical next step toward a new kind of distributed intelligence that keeps humans firmly in the loop. ... While protocols like MCP and A2A have solved basic connectivity, and AGNTCY tackles the problems of discovery, identity management to inter-agent communication and observability, they've only addressed the equivalent of making a phone call between two people who don't speak the same language. But Pandey's team has identified something deeper than technical plumbing: the need for agents to achieve collective intelligence, not just coordinated actions. ... "We have to mimic human evolution,” Pandey explained. “In addition to agents getting smarter and smarter, just like individual humans, we need to build infrastructure that enables collective innovation, which implies sharing intent, coordination, and then sharing knowledge or context and evolving that context.” ... Guardrails remain a central challenge in deploying multi-functional agents that touch every part of an organization's system. The question is how to enforce boundaries without stifling innovation. Organizations need strict, rule-like guardrails, but humans don't actually work that way. Instead, people operate on a principle of minimal harm, or thinking ahead about consequences and making contextual judgments.

Cyber firms face ‘verification crisis’ on real risk

Continuous Threat Exposure Management, commonly referred to as CTEM, has become more widely adopted as a way to structure security work around an organisation's exposure to attack. Even so, only 33% of organisations measure whether exploitable risk is actually reduced over time, according to the report. Instead, most programmes continue to track metrics focused on discovery and volume, such as coverage gaps, asset counts and alert volume. These measures can show rising activity and expanding scope, but they do not necessarily show whether the organisation has reduced the likelihood of a successful attack. "Security programs keep adding tools and expanding scope, but outcomes aren't improving," said Rogier Fischer, CEO and co-founder of Hadrian. ... According to the report, these vulnerabilities were not unknown. They were identified and recorded, but competed for attention as security teams dealt with new alerts, new tickets and the ongoing output of multiple tools. In organisations with complex technology estates, this can create a persistent backlog in which older issues remain unresolved while new potential risks continue to surface. "Security teams can move fast, but too many tools and unverified alerts make it difficult to maintain focus on what actually matters," Fischer said. The report calls for earlier validation of exploitability and success measures that focus on reducing real exposure rather than the number of findings generated.

Trust and Compliance in the Age of AI: Navigating the Risks of Intelligent Software Development

One of the most pressing challenges is trust in AI-generated outputs: Many teams report minimal productivity gains despite operational deployment, citing issues such as hallucinated code, misleading suggestions, and a lack of explainability. This trust gap is amplified by the opaque nature of many AI systems; developers often report struggling to understand how models arrive at decisions, making it difficult for them to validate outputs or debug errors. This lack of transparency, known as black box AI, puts teams at risk of accepting flawed code or test cases, potentially introducing vulnerabilities or performance regressions. ... AI's reliance on data introduces significant compliance risks, especially when proprietary documentation or sensitive datasets are used to train models. Continuing to conduct business the old-fashioned way is not the answer because traditional compliance frameworks often lag behind AI innovation, and governance models built for deterministic systems struggle with probabilistic outputs and autonomous decision-making. ... Another risk with potentially serious consequences: AI-generated code often lacks context. It may not align with architectural patterns, business rules, or compliance requirements, and without rigorous review, these changes can degrade system integrity and increase technical debt. It also must be noted that faster code generation does not equal better code. There is a risk of "bloated" or unsecure code being generated, requiring rigorous validation.

The Cost of AI Slop in Lines of Code

Before we can get to the problem of excessive lines of code, we need to understand how LLMs arrived at the generation of code with unnecessary lines. The answer is in the training dataset and how that dataset was sourced from publicly accessible places, including open repositories on Github and coding websites. These sources lack any form of quality control, and therefore the code the LLMs learned on is of varying quality. ... In the quest to get as much training data as possible, there was little effort available to vet the training data to ensure that it was good training data. The result LLMs outputting the kind of code written by a first-year developer – and that should be concerning to us. ... Some of the common vulnerabilities that we’ve known about for decades, including cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and log injection, are the kinds of vulnerabilities that AI introduces into the code – and it generates this code at rates that are multiples of what even junior developers produce. In a time when it’s important that we be more cautious about security, AI can’t do it. ... Today, we have AI generating bloated code that creates maintenance problems, and we’re looking the other way. It can’t structure code to minimize code duplication. It doesn’t care that there are two, three, four, or more implementations of basic operations that could be made into one generic function. The code it was trained on didn’t generate the abstractions to create the right functions, so it can’t get there.

Why Jurisdiction Choice Is the Newest AI Security Filter

AI moves exponentially faster than legislation and regulations ever could. By the time that sector regulators or governing bodies have drafted frameworks, held consultations, and passed laws through their incumbent democratic processes, the technology has already evolved and scaled far ahead. Not to be too hyperbolic, but the rules could prove irrelevant for a widely-adopted technology and solution that's far outpaced them. This creates what's been dubbed the "speed of instinct" challenge. In essence, how can you possibly regulate something that reinvents itself regularly? ... Rather than attempting to codify every possible and conceivable AI scenario into law, Gibraltar developed a principles-based framework, emphasizing clarity, proportionality, and innovation. Essentially, the framework recognizes that AI regulations must be adaptive and not binary. ... While frameworks exist at both ends of the spectrum—with some enforcing strict rules and others encouraging innovation with AI technology—neither solution is inherently superior. The EU model provides more certainty and protection for humans, but the agile model has merit with responsive governance and the encouragement of rapid innovation. For cybersecurity teams deploying AI, the smart strategy is understanding both standpoints and choosing jurisdictions strategically and with informed processes. Scale and implications matter profoundly; a customer chatbot may have fewer jurisdictional considerations than an internal threat intelligence platform.

Daily Tech Digest - January 24, 2026

Quote for the day:

"Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement." -- W. Clement Stone

When a new chief digital officer arrives, what does that mean for the CIO?

One reason the CDO can unsettle CIOs is that the title has never had a consistent meaning. , president and founder of , said organizations typically create the role for one of two reasons. "Some organizations split off a CDO role because the CIO is overly focused on infrastructure and operations, and the business's customer and employee experiences, AI and data initiatives, and other innovations aren't meeting expectations," Sacolick said. "In other organizations, the CDO is a C-level title for the head of product management and , and reports to the CIO." Those two models lead to very different outcomes. In the first, the CDO is positioned as a corrective measure; in the second, the role is an extension of the CIO's broader operating model. Without clarity on which model is being pursued, confusion tends to follow. ... Across the experts, there was strong agreement on one point: The CIO remains central to the enterprise digital operating model, even as new roles emerge. "CIOs need to own the digital operating model and evolve it for the AI era," Sacolick said, noting that this increasingly involves "product-centric, agile, multi-disciplinary team organizational models." echoed that sentiment, emphasizing accountability and trust. "The CIO should be the single point of ownership with the deep expertise feeding into it so there is consistency, business acumen and trust built within the technology function," he said.

Responsible AI moves from principle to practice, but data and regulatory gaps persist: Nasscom

The data shows a strong correlation between AI maturity and responsible practices. Nearly 60% of companies that say they are confident about scaling AI responsibly already have mature RAI frameworks in place. Large enterprises are leading this transition, with 46% reporting mature practices. Startups and SMEs trail behind at 16% and 20% respectively, but Nasscom sees this as ecosystem-wide momentum rather than a gap, given the growing willingness among smaller firms to learn, comply, and invest. ... Workforce enablement has become a central pillar of this transition. Nearly nine out of ten organisations surveyed are investing in sensitisation and training around Responsible AI. Companies report the highest confidence in meeting data protection obligations—reflecting relatively mature privacy frameworks—but monitoring-related compliance continues to be a concern. Accountability for AI governance still sits largely at the top. ... As AI systems become more autonomous, Responsible AI is increasingly seen as the deciding factor for whether organisations can scale with confidence. Nearly half of mature organisations believe their current frameworks are prepared to handle emerging technologies such as agentic AI. At the same time, industry experts caution that most existing frameworks will need substantial updates to address new categories of risk introduced by more autonomous systems. The report concludes that sustained investment in skills, governance mechanisms, high-quality data, and continuous monitoring will be essential.

AI-induced cultural stagnation is no longer speculation − it’s already happening

Regardless of how diverse the starting prompts were – and regardless of how much randomness the systems were allowed – the outputs quickly converged onto a narrow set of generic, familiar visual themes: atmospheric cityscapes, grandiose buildings and pastoral landscapes. Even more striking, the system quickly “forgot” its starting prompt. ... For the past few years, skeptics have warned that generative AI could lead to cultural stagnation by flooding the web with synthetic content that future AI systems then train on. Over time, the argument goes, this recursive loop would narrow diversity and innovation. Champions of the technology have pushed back, pointing out that fears of cultural decline accompany every new technology. Humans, they argue, will always be the final arbiter of creative decisions. ... The study shows that when meaning is forced through such pipelines repeatedly, diversity collapses not because of bad intentions, malicious design or corporate negligence, but because only certain kinds of meaning survive the text-to-image-to-text repeated conversions. This does not mean cultural stagnation is inevitable. Human creativity is resilient. Institutions, subcultures and artists have always found ways to resist homogenization. But in my view, the findings of the study show that stagnation is a real risk – not a speculative fear – if generative systems are left to operate in their current iteration.

Europe votes to tackle deep dependence on US tech in sovereignty drive

The depth of European reliance on foreign technology providers varies across sectors but remains substantial throughout the stack. In cloud infrastructure alone, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google command 70% of the European market, while local providers including , , and collectively hold just 15%. ... “Recent geopolitical tensions show that the issue of Europe’s digital sovereignty is of the utmost importance,” , the who negotiated the report text, said in a statement. “If we do not act now to reduce Europe’s technological dependence on foreign actors, we run the risk of becoming a digital colony.” ... “Due to geopolitical tensions, the driver has shifted to reducing foreign digital dependency across the entire technology stack. are now tasked with redesigning their approach to semiconductors, cloud, software, and AI, upending two decades of established strategy. It’s not going to be easy, it’s not going to be cheap, and it’s going to span multiple generations of CIOs.” When asked whether will see viable sovereign alternatives across core technology areas, said: The answer is yes, but the time horizon is potentially more than a decade. Europe has been supporting US technology providers through licensing agreements for the better part of the last two decades. ... A key question is whether the report’s proposed preferential procurement policies can actually change market realities, given the

One-time SMS links that never expire can expose personal data for years

One of the most significant findings involved how long these links remained active. All 701 confirmed URLs still worked when the researchers accessed them, often long after the original message was sent. More than half of the exposed links were between one and two years old. About 46% were older than two years. Some dated back to 2019. Public SMS gateways rarely retain messages for that long, which suggests that the actual lifetime of many links may extend even further. The risk starts as soon as a private link is exposed, but it grows with time. The longer a link stays active, the more chances there are for abuse through logs, forwarding, compromised devices, message interception, phone number recycling, or third-party access. ... In many services, the link carried a token passed to backend APIs. Some pages rendered data server side, while others fetched information after load. Only five services placed personal data directly inside the URL itself, though access results were similar once the link was opened. This design assumes the link remains private. According to Danish, product pressure plays a central role in keeping this pattern widespread. ... In one case, an order tracking page displayed an address, while API responses included phone numbers, geolocation data, and driver details. In another, a loan service returned bank routing numbers and Social Security numbers that were only visible in network logs. This data became reachable as soon as the link was opened, even before the page finished loading.

How enterprise architecture and start-up thinking drive strategic success

Strategy is now judged less by the quality of vision decks and more by how quickly enterprises can test, learn and scale what works and is valuable. To beat the heat, enterprises increasingly combine the discipline of enterprise architecture with the speed and adaptability associated with a start-up mindset. ... is less about cataloging systems and more about shaping how an enterprise senses opportunities, mobilizes resources and transforms at pace. In a high-performing enterprise, it acts as a bridge between strategy and execution in three concrete ways, i.e., alignment and clarity, transparency and risk management and decision support and adaptive governance. ... Start-ups and scale-ups operate under uncertainty, but they thrive by learning in short cycles, minimizing waste and scaling only what demonstrates traction. When large enterprises infuse enterprise architecture with similar principles, the function becomes a multiplier for speed rather than a constraint. ... Cross-functional innovation and flexible governance complete the picture. In many enterprises, architects now embed directly in domain or platform teams, joining strategic backlog refinement, incident reviews and design sessions as peers. In a large healthcare network, for instance, enterprise architecture practitioners joined clinical, operations and analytics teams to co-design a data platform that could support both operational reporting and AI-driven decision support.

From Conflict To Collaboration: How Tension Can Strengthen Your Team

Letting tensions simmer is one of the most common leadership mistakes. The longer a disagreement sits in the corner, the more toxic it becomes. ... Teams function better when they normalize honest conversation before things go sideways. A simple practice—opening meetings with "wins and worries"—creates a habit of surfacing concerns early. echoes this principle: "Only say about someone what you will say to their face." It’s a powerful expectation. Candor reduces gossip, eliminates guesswork and gives leaders clarity long before emotions get out of hand. ... When conflict arises, people don’t immediately need solutions. What they need is to feel heard. It’s vital to fully understand their concerns so there is no ambiguity. Repeat your understanding of their position before giving your input. It’s remarkable how much progress can be made when people feel genuinely heard. ... Compromise has an unfair reputation in business culture, as if giving an inch signals defeat. In practice, it’s a recognition that multiple perspectives may hold merit. Good leaders invite both sides to walk through their rival viewpoints together. When people better understand the context behind each position, they’re far more willing to find common ground that moves the team forward. ... Many conflicts resurface not because the solution was wrong, but because leaders assumed the first conversation fixed everything.

Six tips to gain control over your cloud spending

The first step any organization should take before shifting a workload to the cloud is performing proper due diligence on ROI. It isn’t always the case that moving workloads to the cloud will translate into financial savings. Many variables should be considered when calculating ROI, including current infrastructure, licensing and hiring. ... A formal cloud governance framework establishes rules, policies, and processes that formalize how cloud resources will be accessed, used, and retired. Accurately matching cloud resources to workload demands improves resource utilization and minimizes waste. ... , short for financial operations, is a management discipline that involves collaboration between finance, operations and development teams to manage cloud spending. By implementing tools and processes for cost tracking, budgeting, and forecasting, businesses can gain insights into their cloud expenses and identify areas for optimization. ... Providers offer a variety of discounts that can significantly reduce cloud costs. For example, reserved instance pricing models offer discounts to customers who reserve cloud resources over a fixed period. Some providers offer tiered pricing models in which the cost per unit decreases as you consume more resources. ... You may find that moving some workloads to the cloud offers no significant performance advantages. Repatriating some applications, data and workloads back to on-premises infrastructure can often improve performance while reducing cloud spending.

These 4 big technology bets will reshape the global economy in 2026

The impact of disruptive technologies will have a material impact on real GDP growth. suggested that capital investment alone, catalyzed by disruptive innovation platforms, could add 1.9% to annualized real GDP growth this decade. Each innovation platform, AI, public blockchains, robotics, energy storage, and , should provide a structural boost to global growth. ... According to ARK research, hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $500 billion on capital expenditures (Capex) in 2026, nearly four times the $135 billion spent in 2021, the year before the launch of in 2022. ... ARK forecasted that could facilitate more than $8 trillion in online consumption by 2030. ARK noted that as consumers delegate more decisions to intelligent systems, AI agents should capture an increasing share of digital transactions, from 2% of online spend in 2025 to around 25% by 2030 ... AI agents are becoming more productive. ARK found that advances in reasoning capability, tool use, and extended context are driving an exponential increase in the capability of AI agents. The duration of tasks these agents can complete reliably increased 5 times, from six minutes to 31 minutes, in 2025. ... ARK suggested robots are a growing part of the labor force and took a historical look at productivity and labor hours. As productivity increased, each hour of labor became more valuable, enabling increased output with fewer hours, as living standards continued to rise

Half of agentic AI projects are still stuck at the pilot stage

The main barriers to full implementation, respondents said, are concerns with security, privacy, or compliance, cited by 52%, followed by technical challenges to managing agents at scale, at 51%. “Organizations are not slowing adoption because they question the value of AI, but because scaling autonomous systems safely requires confidence that those systems will behave reliably and as intended in real-world conditions,” said , chief technology strategist at . Seven-in-ten agentic AI–powered decisions are still verified by humans, and 87% of organizations are actively building or deploying agents that require human supervision. ... A recurring pain point for enterprises tinkering with agentic AI tools lies in observability, according to Dynatrace. Observability of these autonomous systems is needed across every stage of the life cycle, from development and implementation through to operationalization. Observability is most used in implementation, at 69%, followed by operationalization at 57% and development at 54%. “Observability is a vital component of a successful agentic AI strategy. As organizations push toward greater autonomy, they need real-time visibility into how AI agents behave, interact, and make decisions,” Reitbauer said. “Observability not only helps teams understand performance and outcomes, but it provides the transparency and confidence required to scale agentic AI responsibly and with appropriate oversight.”

Daily Tech Digest - January 20, 2026

Quote for the day:

"The level of morale is a good barometer of how each of your people is experiencing your leadership." -- Danny Cox

The culture you can’t see is running your security operations

Non-observable culture is everything happening inside people’s heads. Their beliefs about cyber risk. Their attitudes toward security. Their values and priorities when security conflicts with convenience or speed. This is where the real decisions get made. You can’t see someone’s belief that “we’re too small to be targeted” or “security is IT’s job, not mine.” You can’t measure their assumption that compliance equals security. You can’t audit their gut feeling that reporting a mistake will hurt their career. But these invisible forces shape every security decision your people make. Non-observable culture includes beliefs about the likelihood and severity of threats. It includes how people weigh security against productivity. It includes their trust in leadership and their willingness to admit mistakes. It includes all the cognitive biases that distort risk perception. ... Implicit culture is the stuff nobody talks about because nobody even realizes it’s there. The unspoken assumptions. The invisible norms. The “way things are done here” that everyone knows but nobody questions. This is the most powerful layer because it operates below conscious awareness. People don’t choose to follow implicit norms. They do. Automatically. Without thinking. Implicit culture includes unspoken beliefs like “security slows us down” or “leadership doesn’t really care about this.” It contains hidden power dynamics that determine who can challenge security decisions and who can’t.

The top 6 project management mistakes — and what to do instead

Project managers are trained to solve project problems. Scope creep. Missed deadlines. Resource bottlenecks. ... Start by helping your teams understand the business context behind the work. What problem are we trying to solve? Why does this project matter to the organization? What outcome are we aiming for? Your teams can’t answer those questions unless you bring them into the strategy conversation. When they understand the business goals, not just the project goals, they can start making decisions differently. Their conversations change to ensure everyone knows why their work matters. ... Right from the start of the project, you need to define not just the business goal but how you’ll measure it was successful in business terms. Did the project reduce cost, increase revenue, improve the customer experience? That’s what you and your peers care about, but often that’s not the focus you ask the project people to drive toward. ... People don’t resist because they’re lazy or difficult. They resist because they don’t understand why it’s happening or what it means for them. And no amount of process will fix that. With an accelerated delivery plan designed to drive business value, your project teams can now turn their attention to bringing people with them through the change process. ... To keep people engaged in the project and help it keep accelerating toward business goals, you need purpose-driven communication designed to drive actions and decisions.

AI has static identity verification in its crosshairs. Now what?

Identity models based on “joiner–mover–leaver” workflows and static permission assignments cannot keep pace with the fluid and temporary nature of AI agents. These systems assume identities are created carefully, permissions are assigned deliberately, and changes rarely happen. AI changes all of that. An agent can be created, perform sensitive tasks, and terminate within seconds. If your verification model only checks identity at login, you’re leaving the entire session vulnerable. ... Securing AI-driven enterprises requires a shift similar to what we saw in the move from traditional firewalls to zero-trust architectures. We didn’t eliminate networks; we elevated policy and verification to operate continuously at runtime. Identity verification for AI must follow the same path. This means building a system that can: Assign verifiable identities to every human and machine actor; Evaluate permissions dynamically based on context and intent; Enforce least privilege at high velocity; Verify actions, not just entry points; ... This is why frameworks like SPIFFE and modern workload identity systems are receiving so much attention. They treat identity as a short-lived, cryptographically verifiable construct that can be created, used, and retired in seconds, exactly the model AI agents require. Human activity is becoming the minority as autonomous systems that can act faster than we can are being spun up and terminated before governance can keep up. That’s why identity verification must shift from a checkpoint to a real-time trust engine that evaluates every action from every actor, human or AI.

AWS European cloud service launch raises questions over sovereignty

AWS established a new legal entity to operate the European Sovereign Cloud under a separate governance and operational model. The new company is incorporated in Germany and run exclusively by EU residents, AWS said. ... “This is the elephant in the room,” said Rene Buest, senior director analyst at Gartner. There are two main concerns regarding the operation of AWS’s European Sovereign Cloud for businesses in Europe. The first relates to the 2018 US Cloud Act, which could require AWS to disclose customer data stored in Europe to the United States, if requested by US authorities. The second involves the possibility of US government sanctions: If a business that uses AWS services is subject to such sanctions, AWS may be compelled to block that company’s access to its cloud services, even if its data and operations are based in Europe. ... It’s an open question at this stage, said Dario Maisto, senior analyst at Forrester. “Cases will have to be tested in court before we can have a definite answer,” he said. “The legal ownership does matter, and this is one of the points that may not be addressed by the current setup of the AWS sovereign cloud.” AWS’s European Sovereign Cloud represents one of several ways that European business can approach the challenge of digital sovereignty. Gartner identifies a spectrum that ranges from global hyperscaler public cloud services through to regional cloud services that are based on non-hyperscaler technology.

Why peripheral automation is the missing link in end-to-end digital transformation?

While organisations have successfully modernized their digital cores, the “last mile” of business operations often remains fragmented, manual, and surprisingly analogue. This gap is why Peripheral Automation is emerging not merely as a tactical correction but as the critical missing link in achieving true, end-to-end digital transformation. ... Peripheral Automation offers a strategic resolution to this paradox. It’s an architectural philosophy that advocates “differential innovation.” Rather than disrupting stable cores to accommodate fleeting business needs, organisations build agile, tailored applications and workflows that sit on top of the core systems. This approach treats the enterprise as a layered ecosystem. The core remains the single source of truth, but the periphery becomes the “system of engagement”. By leveraging modern low-code platforms and composable architecture, leaders can deploy lightweight, purpose-built automation tools that address specific friction points without altering the underlying infrastructure. ... Peripheral automation reduces process latency, manual effort, and rework. By addressing specific pain points rather than attempting broad, multi-year system redesigns, companies unlock measurable efficiency in weeks. This precision improves throughput, reduces cycle times, and frees teams to focus on high-value work.

How does agentic ops transform IT troubleshooting?

AI Canvas introduces a fundamentally different user experience for network troubleshooting. Rather than navigating through multiple dashboards and CLI interfaces, engineers interact with a dynamic canvas that populates with relevant widgets as troubleshooting progresses. You could say that the ‘canvas’ part of the name AI Canvas is the most important part of it. That is, AI Canvas is actually a blank canvas every time you start troubleshooting. It fills the canvas with boxes and on the fly widgets, among other things, during the troubleshooting. Sampath confirms this: “When you ask a question, it’s using and picking the right types of tools that it can go and execute on a specific task and calls agents to be able to effectively take a task to completion and returns a response back.” The system can spin up monitoring agents that continuously provide updated information, creating a living troubleshooting environment rather than static reports. ... AI Canvas doesn’t exist in isolation. It builds on Cisco’s existing automation foundation. The company previously launched Workflows, a no-code network automation engine, and AI assistants with specific skills for network operations. “All of the automations that are already baked into the workflows, the skills that were built inside of the assistants, now manifest themselves inside of the canvas,” Sampath details. This creates a continuum from deterministic workflows to semi-autonomous assistants to fully autonomous agentic operations.

UK government launches industry 'ambassadors' scheme to champion software security improvements

"By acting as ambassadors, signatories are committing to a process of transparency, development and continuous improvement. The implementation of this code of practice will take time and, in doing so, may bring to light issues that need to be addressed," DSIT said in a statement confirming the announcement. "Signatories and policymakers will learn from these issues as well as the successes and challenges for each organization and, where appropriate, will share information to help develop and strengthen this government policy." ... The Software Security Code of Practice was unveiled by the NCSC in May last year, setting out a series of voluntary principles defining what good software security looks like across the entire software lifecycle. Aimed at technology providers and organizations that develop, sell, or procure software, the code offers best practices for secure design and development, build-environment security, and secure deployment and maintenance. The code also emphasizes the importance of transparent communication with customers on potential security risks and vulnerabilities. ... “The code moves software security beyond narrow compliance and elevates it to a board-level resilience priority. As supply chain attacks continue to grow in scale and impact, a shared baseline is essential and through our global community and expertise, ISC2 is committed to helping professionals build the skills needed to put secure-by-design principles into practice.”

Privacy teams feel the strain as AI, breaches, and budgets collide

Where boards prioritize privacy, AI use appears more frequently and follows defined direction. Larger enterprises, particularly those with broader risk and compliance functions, also report higher uptake. In smaller organizations, or those where privacy has limited visibility at the leadership level, AI adoption remains tentative. Teams that apply privacy principles throughout system development report higher use of AI for privacy tasks. In these environments, AI supports ongoing work rather than introducing new approaches. ... Respondents working in organizations where privacy has active board backing report more consistent use of privacy by design. Budget stability shows a similar pattern, with better-funded teams reporting stronger integration of privacy into design and engineering work. The study also shows that privacy by design on its own does not stop breaches. Organizations that experienced breaches report similar levels of design practice as those that did not. The data places privacy by design mainly in a governance and compliance role, with limited connection to incident prevention. ... Governance shapes how teams view that risk. Professionals in organizations where privacy lacks board priority report higher expectations of a breach in the coming year. Gaps between privacy strategy and broader business goals also appear alongside higher breach expectations, suggesting that structural alignment influences outlook as much as technical controls. Confidence remains common, even among organizations that have experienced breaches.

Cyber Insights 2026: Information Sharing

The sheer volume of cyber threat intelligence being generated today is overwhelming. “Information sharing channels often help condense inputs and highlight genuine signals amid industry noise,” says Caitlin Condon, VP of security research at VulnCheck. “The very nature of cyber threat intelligence demands validation, context, and comparison. Information sharing allows cybersecurity professionals to more rigorously assess rising threats, identify new trends and deviations, and develop technically comprehensive guidance.” ... “The importance of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 for U.S. national security cannot be overstated,” says Crystal Morin, cybersecurity strategist at Sysdig. “Without legal protections, many legal departments would advise security teams to pull back from sharing threat intelligence, resulting in slower, more cautious processes. ...” CISOs have developed their own closed communities where they can discuss current incidents with other CISOs. This is done via channels such as Slack, WhatsApp and Signal. Security of the channels is a concern, but who better than multiple CISOs to monitor and control security? ... “Much of today’s threat intelligence remains reactive, driven by short-lived IoCs that do little to help agencies anticipate or disrupt cyberattacks,” comments BeyondTrust’s Greene. “We need to modernize our information-sharing framework to emphasize behavior-based analytics enriched with identity-centric context,” he continues.

Edge AI: The future of AI inference is smarter local compute

The bump in edge AI goes hand in hand with a broader shift in focus from AI training, the act of preparing machine learning (ML) models with the right data, to inference, the practice of actively using models to apply knowledge or make predictions in production. “Advancements in powerful, energy-efficient AI processors and the proliferation of IoT (internet of things) devices are also fueling this trend, enabling complex AI models to run directly on edge devices,” says Sumeet Agrawal ... “The primary driver behind the edge AI boom is the critical need for real-time data processing,” says David. The ability to analyze data on the edge, rather than using centralized cloud-based AI workloads, helps direct immediate decisions at the source. Others agree. “Interest in edge AI is experiencing massive growth,” says Informatica’s Agrawal. For him, reduced latency is a key factor, especially in industrial or automotive settings where split-second decisions are critical. There is also the desire to feed ML models personal or proprietary context without sending such data to the cloud. “Privacy is one powerful driver,” says Johann Schleier-Smith ... A smaller footprint for local AI is helpful for edge devices, where resources like processing capacity and bandwidth are constrained. As such, techniques to optimize SLMs will be a key area to aid AI on the edge. One strategy is quantization, a model compression technique that reduces model size and processing requirements.

Daily Tech Digest - January 01, 2026

Quote for the day:

"It always seems impossible until it’s done." -- Nelson Mandela

Why data trust is the missing link in digital transformation

Data trust is often framed as a technical issue, delegated to IT or data teams. In reality, it is a business capability with direct implications for growth, risk, and reputation. Trusted data enables organisations to: Confidently automate customer and operational workflows; Personalise experiences without introducing errors; Improve forecasting and performance reporting; and Reduce operational rework and exception handling When data cannot be trusted, leaders are forced to rely on manual checks, conservative assumptions, and duplicated processes. This increases cost and slows decision-making - the opposite of what digital transformation aims to achieve. .... Establishing data trust is not a one-time project. It requires a shift in mindset across the organisation. Data quality should be viewed as a shared responsibility, supported by the right processes and tools. Leading organisations embed data validation into their digital workflows, measure data quality as part of system health, and treat trusted data as a strategic asset. Over time, this creates a culture where decisions are made with confidence and transformation initiatives are more likely to succeed. ... Digital transformation is ultimately about enabling better decisions, faster execution, and stronger customer relationships. None of these goals can be achieved without trusted data. As organisations continue to modernise their platforms and processes, data quality should be treated as core infrastructure, not an afterthought.

Health Data Privacy, Cyber Regs: What to Watch in 2026

When federal regulators hesitate, states often jump into filing privacy and security gaps involving health data. That includes mandates in New York to shore up cybersecurity at certain hospitals (see: New York Hospitals Are Facing Tougher Cyber Rules Than HIPAA). Also worth watching is the New York Health Information Privacy Act, Greene said. "It was passed by both New York legislative chambers in January but has not yet been formally submitted to the governor for signature, with lobbying efforts underway to amend it." "In its most recent version, it would be the toughest health privacy law in the country in many respects, including a controversial prohibition on obtaining consents for secondary uses of data until at least 24 hours after an individual creates an account or first uses the requested product or service," Greene said. ... Greene predicted HIPAA resolution agreements and civil monetary penalties will continue much as they have in years past, with one to two dozen such cases next year. HHS has recently indicated that it intends to begin enforcing the Information Blocking Rule. "The primary target will be health IT developers," Greene said. "I expect that there are less information blocking issues with health information networks and believe that the statute and regulation's knowledge standard makes it more challenging to enforce against healthcare providers because the government must prove that a healthcare provider knew its practice to be unreasonable."

From integration pain to partnership gain: How collaboration strengthens cybersecurity

When collaborators leverage data in specific cybersecurity work, they unlock several valuable benefits, especially since no organization has complete insight into every possible threat. A shared, data-driven cybersecurity framework can offer both sides a better understanding of existing and emerging threats that could undermine one or both collaborators. Data-driven collaboration also enables partners to become more proactive in their cybersecurity posture. Coordinated data can give business partners insights into where there’s greater exposure for a cyberattack, allowing partners to work together with data-backed guidance on how to better prepare. ... The Vested model — an innovative approach based on research from the University of Tennessee — focuses on shared goals and outcomes rather than traditional transactional buyer and seller agreements. Both companies agreed on a specific set of KPIs they could use to measure the health of the partnership and keep their security goals on track, allowing them to continue to adapt cybersecurity initiatives as needs and threats evolve. “You have to build, maintain and exercise the right partnerships with business units and shared services across the enterprise so continuity plans identify the issue quickly, deploy appropriate mitigations, and ultimately restore client and business services as quickly as possible,” says Royce Curtin, IBM’s former VP of corporate security.

AI governance: A risk and audit perspective on responsible AI adoption

AI governance refers to the policies, procedures, and oversight mechanisms that guide how AI systems are developed, deployed, and monitored. It ensures that AI aligns with business objectives, complies with applicable laws, and operates in a way that is ethical and transparent. Regulatory scrutiny is increasing. The EU AI Act is setting a precedent for global standards, and U.S. agencies are signaling more aggressive enforcement, particularly in sectors like healthcare, finance, and employment. Organizations are expected to demonstrate accountability in how AI systems make decisions, manage data, and interact with users. Beyond regulation, there is growing pressure from customers, employees, and investors. ... Audit teams also help boards and audit committees understand the risks associated with AI. Their work supports transparency and builds trust with regulators and stakeholders. As AI becomes more embedded in business operations, internal audit must expand its scope to include model governance, data lineage, and ethical risk. ... Organizations that treat AI as a strategic risk are better positioned to scale it responsibly. Risk and internal audit teams have a central role in ensuring that AI systems are secure, compliant, and aligned with business goals. Citrin Cooperman helps organizations navigate AI adoption with confidence by combining deep risk expertise, practical governance frameworks, and advanced technology solutions that support secure, scalable, and compliant growth.

Six data shifts that will shape enterprise AI in 2026

While RAG won't entirely disappear in 2026, one approach that will likely surpass it in terms of usage for agentic AI is contextual memory, also known as agentic or long-context memory. This technology enables LLMs to store and access pertinent information over extended periods. Multiple such systems emerged over the course of 2025 including Hindsight, A-MEM framework, General Agentic Memory (GAM), LangMem, and Memobase. RAG will remain useful for static data, but agentic memory is critical for adaptive assistants and agentic AI workflows that must learn from feedback, maintain state, and adapt over time. In 2026, contextual memory will no longer be a novel technique; it will become table stakes for many operational agentic AI deployments. ... In 2025, we saw numerous innovations, like the notion that an AI is able to parse data from an unstructured data source like a PDF. That's a capability that has existed for several years, but proved harder to operationalize at scale than many assumed. Databricks now has an advanced parser, and other vendors, including Mistral, have emerged with their own improvements. The same is true with natural language to SQL translation. While some might have assumed that was a solved problem, it's one that continued to see innovation in 2025 and will see more in 2026. It's critical for enterprises to stay vigilant in 2026.

Communicating AI Risk to the Board With Confidence

Most board members can comprehend that AI will drive growth. What they fail to grasp concretely is how the technology introduces a massive amount of exposure. This predicament is typically a result of how information is presented. Security and risk managers (SRMs) often describe AI incidents in the vocabulary of adversarial inputs, model drift, and architecture choices, which matter deeply but rarely answer the questions that directors tackle during their meetings. High-level stakeholders, in reality, are concerned with issues such as revenue protection, operational continuity, and competitive differentiation, creating a gap that requires more than translating acronyms. ... Traditional discussions about technology risk revolve around the triad of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Boards know these categories well, and over the past few decades, they have learned that cybersecurity failures directly affect the business along these lines. GenAI has formidably challenged this familiar structure, with its associated risks not limited to one of these three domains. ... When the conversation begins with the business consequence, though, the relevance is immediate. The most effective approach involves replacing those mechanics that mean so much to the internal teams with the strategic information boards need to operate. These details open a path for meaningful conversations that encourage directors to think through the implications and make more informed decisions.

The six biggest security challenges coming in 2026

For many organizations, cybersecurity and resilience is a compliance exercise. But it must evolve into “a core intentional cybersecurity capability”, says Dimitriadis. “In 2026, organizations will need to build the capacity to anticipate regulatory changes, understand their strategic implications, and embed them into long-term planning.” ... Attackers are leveraging AI to create convincing email templates and fake websites “almost indistinguishable” from real ones – and without the common warning signs employees are trained to identify, says Mitchell. AI is also being used in vishing attacks, with deepfakes making it easier to clone the voice of high-ranking company executives to trick victims. In 2026, there will be more attacks utilizing realistic voice cloning and high-quality video deepfakes, says Joshua Walsh ... There is a current shift towards agentic AI that can take real-world actions, such as adjusting configurations, interacting with APIs, booking services and initiating financial tasks. This can increase efficiency, but it can also lead to unsafe decisions made at speed, says rradar’s Walsh. An agent told to "optimize performance" might disable logging or bypass authentication because it views security controls as delays, he suggests. Prompt injection is a hidden issue to look out for, he adds. “If a threat actor slips hidden instructions into data that the agent consumes, they can make it run actions on internal systems without anyone realising.”

5 Changes That Will Define AI-Native Enterprises in 2026

As enterprises scale to multi-agent systems, the engineering focus will shift from creating prompts to architecting context. Multi-agent workflows rapidly expand requirements with tool definitions, conversation history, and data from multiple sources. This creates two challenges: context windows fill up, and models suffer from “context rot,” forgetting information buried in lengthy prompts. By mid-2026, context engineering will emerge as a distinct discipline with dedicated teams and specialized infrastructure, serving the minimal but complete information agents need. The best context engineers will understand both LLM constraints and their business domain’s semantic structure. ... Enterprises are realizing that AI agents need both data and meaning. Companies that spent years perfecting data lakes are already finding those assets are insufficient. AI can retrieve data, but without semantic context, it can’t interpret action or intent. That’s why teams will move beyond vector search toward building knowledge graphs, ontologies, and metadata-driven maps that teach AI how their business works. The battleground will shift from owning raw data to owning its interpretation. Off-the-shelf agents will struggle in complex domains because semantics are domain-specific. ... The AI-native enterprise looks very different from what came before. It serves machine customers, treats context as critical infrastructure, and has the tools to escape decades of technical debt.

Microsegmentation: the unsung hero of cybersecurity (and why it should be your top priority)

Think of your network like an apartment building. You’ve got a locked front door — that’s your perimeter. But once someone gets inside, there’s no front desk checking IDs, no elevator security and the same outdated lock on every unit. An intruder can roam freely, entering any apartment they choose. Microsegmentation is the internal security system. It’s the keycard for the elevator, the camera in the hallway, the unique lock on your door. It’s what stops one compromised device from becoming a full-blown breach. ... OT environments are different. They’re often built on legacy systems, lack patching and operate in real-time. You can’t just drop an agent or reroute traffic without risking downtime. That’s why agencies need solutions that are agentless, software-defined and tailored to the unique constraints of OT. Otherwise, you’re only protecting half the house. ... Microsegmentation also plays a critical role in enabling zero trust. It enforces least privilege at the network level. It’s not just about who gets in; it’s about what they can touch once they’re inside. For agencies building toward zero trust, microsegmentation isn’t an afterthought. It’s a foundation. Despite all this, microsegmentation remains underutilized. According to TechTarget’s Enterprise Strategy Group, only 36% of organizations use it today, even though it’s foundational to zero trust. Why? Because 28% believe it’s too complex. But that perception is often rooted in outdated tooling.

Beyond Chatbots: What Makes an AI Agent Truly Autonomous

Autonomous agents must retain and use context over time. Memory enables an agent to recall previous interactions, data, and decisions—allowing it to continue a process seamlessly without restarting each time. That persistence turns single exchanges into long-running workflows. In enterprise settings, it means an agent can track a contract review across multiple sessions or follow a complex support case without losing context. ... Traditional automation runs on fixed, rule-based workflows. Autonomous agents build and revise their own plans on the fly, adapting to results and feedback. This ability to plan dynamically—think, act, observe, and adjust—is what differentiates agentic AI from robotic process automation (RPA) or prompt chaining. In practice, an agent might be tasked with analyzing a set of contracts, then automatically decide how to proceed: extract key terms, assess risk, and summarize results. ... Resilient agents are designed to operate across models, retry failed actions, or launch sub-agents to handle specialized work—all within defined guardrails. That adaptability is what separates a proof of concept (POC) from a production-ready system. ... All the reasoning in the world means little if an agent can’t execute. Tools are what translate intelligence into impact. They’re the functions, APIs, and integrations that allow agents to interact with business systems—searching systems, generating documents, updating records, or triggering workflows across CRMs, ERPs, and analytics platforms.

Daily Tech Digest - November 01, 2025

Quote for the day:

"Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement." -- W. Clement Stone

How to Fix Decades of Technical Debt

Technical debt drains companies of time, money and even customers. It arises whenever speed is prioritized over quality in software development, often driven by the pressure to accelerate time to market. In such cases, immediate delivery takes precedence, while long-term sustainability is compromised. The Twitter Fail Whale incident between 2007 and 2012 is testimony to the adage: "Haste makes waste." ... Gartner says companies that learn to manage technical debt will achieve at least 50% faster service delivery times to the business. But organizations that fail to do this properly can expect higher operating expenses, reduced performance and a longer time to market. ... Experts say the blame for technical debt should not be put squarely on the IT department. There are other reasons, and other forms of debt that hold back innovation. In his blog post, Masoud Bahrami, independent software consultant and architect, prefers to use terms such as "system debt" and "business debt," arguing that technical debt does not necessarily stem from outdated code, as many people assume. "Calling it technical makes it sound like only developers are responsible. So calling it purely technical is misleading. Some people prefer terms like design debt, organizational debt or software obligations. Each emphasizes a different aspect, but at its core, it's about unaddressed compromises that make future work more expensive and risky," he said.

Modernizing Collaboration Tools: The Digital Backbone of Resilience

Resilience is not only about planning and governance—it depends on the tools that enable real-time communication and decision-making. Disruptions test not only continuity strategies but also the technology that supports them. If incident management platforms are inaccessible, workforce scheduling collapses, or communication channels fail, even well-prepared organizations may falter. ... Crisis response depends on speed. When platforms are not integrated, departments must pass information manually or through multiple channels. Each delay multiplies risks. For example, IT may detect ransomware but cannot quickly communicate containment status to executives. Without updates, communications teams may delay customer notifications, and legal teams may miss regulatory deadlines. In crises, minutes matter. ... Integration across functions is another essential requirement. Incident management platforms should not operate in silos but instead bring together IT alerts, HR notifications, supply chain updates, and corporate communications. When these inputs are consolidated into a centralized dashboard, the resilience council and crisis management teams can view the same data in real time. This eliminates the risk of misaligned responses, where one department may act on incomplete information while another is waiting for updates. A truly integrated platform creates a single source of truth for decision-making under pressure.

AI-powered bug hunting shakes up bounty industry — for better or worse

Security researchers turning to AI is creating a “firehose of noise, false positives, and duplicates,” according to Ollmann. “The future of security testing isn’t about managing a crowd of bug hunters finding duplicate and low-quality bugs; it’s about accessing on demand the best experts to find and fix exploitable vulnerabilities — as part of a continuous, programmatic, offensive security program,” Ollmann says. Trevor Horwitz, CISO at UK-based investment research platform TrustNet, adds: “The best results still come from people who know how to guide the tools. AI brings speed and scale, but human judgment is what turns output into impact.” ... As common vulnerability types like cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection become easier to mitigate, organizations are shifting their focus and rewards toward findings that expose deeper systemic risk, including identity, access, and business logic flaws, according to HackerOne. HackerOne’s latest annual benchmark report shows that improper access control and insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities increased between 18% and 29% year over year, highlighting where both attackers and defenders are now concentrating their efforts. “The challenge for organizations in 2025 will be balancing speed, transparency, and trust: measuring crowdsourced offensive testing while maintaining responsible disclosure, fair payouts, and AI-augmented vulnerability report validation,” HackerOne’s Hazen concludes.

Achieving critical key performance indicators (KPIs) in data center operations

KPIs like PUE, uptime, and utilization once sufficed. But in today’s interconnected data center environments, they are no longer enough. Legacy DCIM systems measure what they can see – but not what matters. Their metrics are static, siloed, and reactive, failing to reflect the complex interplay between IT, facilities, sustainability, and service delivery. ... Organizations embracing UIIM and AI tools are witnessing measurable improvements in operational maturity: Manual audits are replaced by automated compliance checks; Capacity planning evolves from static spreadsheets to predictive, data-driven modeling; Service disruptions are mitigated by foresight, not firefighting. These are not theoretical gains. For example, a major international bank operating over 50 global data centers successfully transitioned from fragmented legacy DCIM tools to Rit Tech’s XpedITe platform. By unifying management across three continents, the bank reduced implementation timelines by up to three times, lowered energy and operational costs, and significantly improved regulatory readiness – all through centralized, real-time oversight. ... Enduring digital infrastructure thinks ahead – it anticipates demand, automates risk mitigation, and scales with confidence. For organizations navigating complex regulatory landscapes, emerging energy mandates, and AI-scale workloads, the choice is stark: evolve to intelligent infrastructure management, or accept the escalating cost of reactive operations.

Accelerating Zero Trust With AI: A Strategic Imperative for IT Leaders

Zero trust requires stringent access controls and continuous verification of identities and devices. Manually managing these policies in a dynamic IT environment is not only cumbersome but also prone to error. AI can automate policy enforcement, ensuring that access controls are consistently applied across the organization. ... Effective identity and access management is at the core of zero trust. AI can enhance IAM by providing continuous authentication and adaptive access controls. “AI-driven access control systems can dynamically set each user's access level through risk assessment in real-time,” according to the CSA report. Traditional IAM solutions often rely on static credentials, such as passwords, which can be easily compromised. ... AI provides advanced analytics capabilities that can transform raw data into actionable insights. In a zero-trust framework, these insights are invaluable for making informed security decisions. AI can correlate data from various sources — such as network logs, endpoint data and threat intelligence feeds — to provide a holistic view of an organization’s security posture. ... One of the most significant advantages of AI in a zero-trust context is its predictive capabilities. The CSA report notes that by analyzing historical data and identifying patterns, AI can predict potential security incidents before they occur. This proactive approach enables organizations to address vulnerabilities and threats in their early stages, reducing the likelihood of successful attacks.

Zombie Projects Rise Again to Undermine Security

"Unlike a human being, software doesn’t give up in frustration, or try to modify its approach, when it repeatedly fails at the same task," she wrote. Automation "is great when those renewals succeed, but it also means that forgotten clients and devices can continue requesting renewals unsuccessfully for months, or even years." To solve the problem, the organization has adopted rate limiting and will pause account-hostname pairs, immediately rejecting any requests for a renewal. ... Automation is key to tackling the issue of zombie services, devices, and code. Scanning the package manifests in software, for example, is not enough, because nearly two-thirds of vulnerabilities are transitive — they occur in software package imported by another software package. Scanning manifests only catches about 77% of dependencies, says Black Duck's McGuire. "Focus on components that are both outdated and contain high [or] critical-risk vulnerabilities — de-prioritize everything else," he says. "Institute a strict and regular update cadence for open source components — you need to treat the maintenance of a third-party library with the same rigor you treat your own code." AI poses an even more complex set of problems, says Tenable's Avni. For one, AI services span across a variety of endpoints. Some are software-as-a-service (SaaS), some are integrated into applications, and others are AI agents running on endpoints.

Are room-temperature superconductors finally within reach?

Predicting superconductivity -- especially in materials that could operate at higher temperatures -- has remained an unsolved challenge. Existing theories have long been considered accurate only for low-temperature superconductors, explained Zi-Kui Liu, a professor of materials science and engineering at Penn State. ... For decades, scientists have relied on the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory to describe how conventional superconductors function at extremely low temperatures. According to this theory, electrons move without resistance because of interactions with vibrations in the atomic lattice, called phonons. These interactions allow electrons to pair up into what are known as Cooper pairs, which move in sync through the material, avoiding atomic collisions and preventing energy loss as heat. ... The breakthrough centers on a concept called zentropy theory. This approach merges principles from statistical mechanics, which studies the collective behavior of many particles, with quantum physics and modern computational modeling. Zentropy theory links a material's electronic structure to how its properties change with temperature, revealing when it transitions from a superconducting to a non-superconducting state. To apply the theory, scientists must understand how a material behaves at absolute zero (zero Kelvin), the coldest temperature possible, where all atomic motion ceases.

Beyond Accidental Quality: Finding Hidden Bugs with Generative Testing

Automated tests are the cornerstone of modern software development. They ensure that every time we build new functionalities, we do not break existing features our users rely on. Traditionally, we tackle this with example-based tests. We list specific scenarios (or test cases) that verify the expected behaviour. In a banking application, we might write a test to assert that transferring $100 to a friend’s bank account changes their balance from $180 to $280. However, example-based tests have a critical flaw. The quality of our software depends on the examples in our test suites. This leaves out a class of scenarios that the authors of the test did not envision – the "unknown unknowns". Generative testing is a more robust method of testing software. It shifts our focus from enumerating examples to verifying the fundamental invariant properties of our system. ... generative tests try to break the property with randomized inputs. The goal is to ensure that invariants of the system are not violated for a wide variety of inputs. Essentially, it is a three step process:Given a property (aka invariant); Generate varying inputs; To find the smallest input for which the property does not hold. As opposed to traditional test cases, inputs that trigger a bug are not written in the test – they are found by the test engine. That is crucial because finding counter examples to code written by us is not easy or an accurate process. Some bugs simply hide in plain sight – even in basic arithmetic operations like addition.

Learning from the AWS outage: Actions and resources

Drawing on lessons from this and previous incidents, here are three essential steps every organization should take. First, review your architecture and deploy real redundancy. Leverage multiple availability zones within your primary cloud provider and seriously consider multiregion and even multicloud resilience for your most critical workloads. If your business cannot tolerate extended downtime, these investments are no longer optional. Second, review and update your incident response and disaster recovery plans. Theoretical processes aren’t enough. Regularly test and simulate outages at the technical and business process levels. Ensure that playbooks are accurate, roles and responsibilities are clear, and every team knows how to execute under stress. Fast, coordinated responses can make the difference between a brief disruption and a full-scale catastrophe. Third, understand your cloud contracts and SLAs and negotiate better terms if possible. Speak with your providers about custom agreements if your scale can justify them. Document outages carefully and file claims promptly. More importantly, factor the actual risks—not just the “guaranteed” uptime—into your business and customer SLAs. Cloud outages are no longer rare. As enterprises deepen their reliance on the cloud, the risks rise. The most resilient businesses will treat each outage as a crucial learning opportunity to strengthen both technical defenses and contractual agreements before the next problem occurs.

When AI Is the Reason for Mass Layoffs, How Must CIOs Respond?

CIOs may be tempted to try and protect their teams from future layoffs -- and this is a noble goal -- but Dontha and others warn that this focus is the wrong approach to the biggest question of working in the AI age. "Protecting people from AI isn't the answer; preparing them for AI is," Dontha said. "The CIO's job is to redeploy human talent toward high-value work, not preserve yesterday's org chart." ... When a company describes its layoffs as part of a redistribution of resources into AI, it shines a spotlight on its future AI performance. CIOs were already feeling the pressure to find productivity gains and cost savings through AI tools, but the stakes are now higher -- and very public. ... It's not just CIOs at the companies affected that may be feeling this pressure. Several industry experts described these layoffs as signposts for other organizations: That AI strategy needs an overhaul, and that there is a new operational model to test, with fewer layers, faster cycles, and more automation in the middle. While they could be interpreted as warning signs, Turner-Williams stressed that this isn't a time to panic. Instead, CIOs should use this as an opportunity to get proactive. ... On the opposite side, Linthicum advised leaders to resist the push to find quick wins. He observed that, for all the expectations and excitement around AI's impact, ROI is still quite elusive when it comes to AI projects.