The Role of Artificial Consciousness in AI Systems

Creating a Quality Strategy
Some teams might prefer to do ad-hoc exploratory testing with minimal
documentation. Other teams might have elaborate test case management systems
that document all the tests for the product. And there are many other options
in between. Whatever you choose should be right for your team and right for
your product. ... On some teams, the developers write the unit tests, and the
testers write the API and UI tests. On other teams, the developers write the
unit and API tests, and the testers create the UI tests. Even better is to
have both the developers and the testers share the responsibility for creating
and maintaining the API and UI tests. In this way, the developers can
contribute their code management expertise, while the testers contribute their
expertise in knowing what should be tested. ... Some larger companies may have
dedicated security and performance engineers who take care of this testing.
Small startups might have only one development team that needs to be in charge
of everything.
Believe it or not, many vendors, especially in the Internet of Things (IoT),
choose not to fix anything. Sure, they could do it. Several years ago, Linus
Torvalds, Linux's creator, pointed out that "in theory, open-source [IoT
devices] can be patched. In practice, vendors get in the way." Cook remarked,
with malware here, botnets there, and state attackers everywhere, vendors
certainly should protect their devices, but, all too often, they don't.
"Unfortunately, this is the very common stance of vendors who see their
devices as just a physical product instead of a hybrid product/service that
must be regularly updated." Linux distributors, however, aren't as neglectful.
They tend to "'cherry-pick only the 'important' fixes. But what constitutes
'important' or even relevant? Just determining whether to implement a fix
takes developer time." It hasn't helped any that Linus Torvalds has sometimes
made light of security issues. For example, in 2017, Torvalds dismissed some
security developers' [as] "f-cking morons." He didn't mean to put all security
developers in the same basket, but his colorful language set the tone for too
many Linux developers.
As an open-source, Node.js is sponsored by Joyent, a cloud computing and
Node.js best development provider. The firm financed several other
technologies, like the Ruby on Rails framework, and implemented hosting duties
to Twitter and LinkedIn. LinkedIn also became one of the first companies to
use Node.js to create a new project for its mobile application backend. The
technology was next selected by many technology administrators, like Uber,
eBay, and Netflix. Though, it wasn’t until later that wide appropriation of
server-side JavaScript with Node.js server began. The investment in this
technology crested in 2017, and it is still trending on the top. Node.js IDEs,
the most popular code editor, has assistance and plugins for JavaScript and
Node.js, so it simply means how you customize IDE according to the coding
requirements. But, many Node.js developers praise specific tools from VS Code,
Brackets, and WebStorm. Exercising middleware over simple Node.js best
development is a general method that makes developers’ lives more
comfortable.
At first glance, a recently granted South African patent relating to a “food
container based on fractal geometry” seems fairly mundane. The innovation in
question involves interlocking food containers that are easy for robots to
grasp and stack. On closer inspection, the patent is anything but mundane.
That’s because the inventor is not a human being – it is an artificial
intelligence (AI) system called DABUS. ... The granting of the DABUS patent in
South Africa has received widespread backlash from intellectual property
experts. The critics argued that it was the incorrect decision in law, as AI
lacks the necessary legal standing to qualify as an inventor. Many have argued
that the grant was simply an oversight on the part of the commission, which
has been known in the past to be less than reliable. Many also saw this as an
indictment of South Africa’s patent procedures, which currently only consist
of a formal examination step. This requires a check box sort of evaluation:
ensuring that all the relevant forms have been submitted and are duly
completed.
It keeps the vehicle in the center of the lane, but with a little too much
urgency. It's not a safety issue, but to a driver unfamiliar with what's going
on, the steering movements are a little too frequent and a little too jerky. I
can tell that the computer is working really hard to keep the car centered at
all times — I compared it a 16-year old driver who was still learning the
ropes and wasn't quite confident in their abilities, making frequent, jerky
input adjustments as they drive along rather than smoother, more practiced
inputs that an experienced driver would make. It isn't necessary to always be
centered exactly in the lane, after all — an experienced driver knows that
drifting a few inches to the left or right is normal. I said to the Ford
engineers that most people probably wouldn't notice the tiny steering inputs,
but they might lose confidence in the system because of it, even if they
couldn't quite put their finger on why. Future releases will improve on it,
I'm sure. BlueCruise also isn't (yet) aware of anything going on to the side
or behind the vehicle.
Cobalt Strike is a legitimate security tool used by penetration testers to
emulate malicious activity in a network. Over the past few years, malicious
hackers—working on behalf of a nation-state or in search of profit—have
increasingly embraced the software. For both defender and attacker, Cobalt
Strike provides a soup-to-nuts collection of software packages that allow
infected computers and attacker servers to interact in highly customizable
ways. The main components of the security tool are the Cobalt Strike
client—also known as a Beacon—and the Cobalt Strike team server, which sends
commands to infected computers and receives the data they exfiltrate. An
attacker starts by spinning up a machine running Team Server that has been
configured to use specific “malleability” customizations, such as how often
the client is to report to the server or specific data to periodically send.
Then the attacker installs the client on a targeted machine after exploiting a
vulnerability, tricking the user or gaining access by other means.
Test Debt is hard to measure factually, but we can rely on our human capacity
to detect, feel and react to warning signs. For test automation, we can sense
organizational behaviors and specific test automation attributes. Let’s get
back to the Why of our automated tests. One objective of our test automation
effort is to accelerate the delivery of software changes with confidence. The
test automation value disappears when the team starts to bypass the test
automation campaign, search for alternative routes, ask for exceptions.
Various reasons are possible as a long execution time, instability, lack of
understanding, or other maintainability criteria. The execution time is
directly tied to essential indicators of software delivery: lead-time for
changes, cycle-time, and MTTA. These metrics are all part of the Accelerate
report, correlating the organization’s performance with these measures. We
need to constraint our test execution time to limit its impact on these
acceleration metrics. For test automation, it means less but more valuable
tests executed faster.
It's time to improve Linux's security
Creating a Secure REST API in Node.js
In a world first, South Africa grants patent to an artificial intelligence system

Ford's new BlueCruise hands-off driving feature is a solid first effort

Critical Cobalt Strike bug leaves botnet servers vulnerable to takedown

Test Debt Fundamentals: What, Why & Warning Signs

Systems of systems: The next big step for edge AI

Mainframes: The Missing Link To AI (Artificial Intelligence)?

Quote for the day:
"Ninety percent of leadership is the ability to communicate something people want." -- Dianne Feinstein
No comments:
Post a Comment