There have been multiple attempts at providing incentive structures, typically involving sponsorship and bounty systems. Sponsorship makes it possible for consumers of open source software to donate to the projects they favor. Only projects at the top of the tower are typically known and receive sponsorship. This biased selection leads to an imbalance: Foundational bricks that hold up the tower attract few donations, while favorites receive more than they need. In contrast, tea will give package maintainers the opportunity to publish their releases to a decentralized registry powered by a Byzantine fault-tolerant blockchain to eliminate single sources of failure, provide immutable releases, and allow communities to govern their regions of the open-source ecosystem, independent of external agendas. Because of the package manager’s unique position in the developer tool stack—it knows all layers of the tower—it can enable automated and precise value distribution based on actual real-world usage.
Cognitive overload occurs when workers are trying to take in too much information or execute too many tasks. This typically falls under two areas for cybersecurity analysts: intrinsic load, the piecing together of complex technical information to perform incident response activities; and extraneous load, the other 97% of data in a SIEM that they must filter out, while also handling team conversations and sidebar questions. Ultimately, cognitive overload leads to poor performance levels, a lack of focus, and a lack of fulfillment. This can have particularly detrimental consequences within cybersecurity, where ransomware attacks rose 13% year-over-year – more than the past five years combined. To boot, just under half of senior cyber professionals (45%) have considered quitting the industry altogether because of stress. To accommodate the needs of this critical workforce – and fill the 771,000 cyber positions open today – companies must make easing cognitive overload a top priority. Today, it stems from two major issues. First, organizations typically lack direction in cybersecurity, tasking analysts with a broad and daunting: defend our infrastructure. It’s too abstract and leaves them unsure of their roles and responsibilities.
A vulnerability found in an interaction between a Wi-Fi-enabled battery system and an infusion pump for the delivery of medication could provide bad actors with a method for stealing access to Wi-Fi networks used by healthcare organizations, according to Boston-based security firm Rapid7. The most serious issue involves Baxter International’s SIGMA Spectrum infusion pump and its associated Wi-Fi battery system, Rapid7 reported this week. The attack requires physical access to the infusion pump. The root of the problem is that the Spectrum battery units store Wi-Fi credential information on the device in non-volatile memory, which means that a bad actor could simply purchase a battery unit, connect it to the infusion pump, and quicky turn it on and off again to force the infusion pump to write Wi-Fi credentials to the battery’s memory. Rapid7 added that the vulnerability carries the additional risk that discarded or resold batteries could also be acquired in order to harvest Wi-Fi credentials from the original organization, if that organization hadn’t been careful about wiping the batteries down before getting rid of them.
Having proactive safeguards in place is important, but it’s also critical to have effective reactive procedures ready to respond to intrusions, especially to quickly restore the integrity of operations, applications, data, or any combination of the three. Key ICS and SCADA functions should be backed up with hot standbys featuring immediate failover capabilities should their primary counterparts be disrupted. For data protection, automated and contemporaneous backups are preferable; or at least they should be done at a weekly interval. Ideally, the backup storage will be off-network and, even better, offsite, too. The former protects backup data in case malware, such as ransomware, succeeds in circumventing defense-in-depth and network segmentation measures and locks it up. ... Like plant health, safety and environment (HSE) programs, cybersecurity should be considered alongside them as a required mainstay risk-reduction program with support from executive management, owners, and the board of directors.
The rise of big technology companies over the last two decades has made the internet more usable for most people, but has also lead to the creation of a series of 'walled gardens' controlled by them, within which information is held and not easily relocated. As a result, a small number of very large companies control what you search for online, or where you share information with your friends, or even do your shopping. Even worse, these companies have done much to develop what is effectively 'surveillance capitalism' -- taking the information we have shared with them (about what we do, where we go and who we know) to sell to advertisers and others. As smartphones have become one of the key ways we access the web, that surveillance capitalism now follows us wherever we go. And while the rise of social media (the so-called 'Web 2.0' era) promised to make it possible for individuals to produce and share their own content, it was still mostly the big tech companies that remained the gatekeepers. A platform that was once about openness seems to be dominated by big tech.
Restricting users to the data that belongs to their tenant is the most fundamental requirement of multitenant authorization. Tenant isolation barriers are needed to prevent users from accessing sensitive information owned by another account. Such a breach would erode trust in your service and, depending on the type of exposure that occurred, could leave you liable to regulatory penalties. Tenant identification usually occurs early in the lifecycle of a request. Your service should authenticate the user, determine the tenant they belong to, and then limit subsequent interactions to data that’s associated with that tenant. ... Another complication occurs when tenants require unique combinations of roles and actions to mirror their organization’s structures. One org might be satisfied by admin and read-only roles; another may need the admin role to be split into five distinct assignments. The most effective multitenant authorization systems will flexibly accommodate customizations on a per-tenant basis. At the application level, granular permission checks will remain the same; however, the system will need to be configurable so tenants can create their own roles by combining different permissions.
The Multiple Service Instances per Host pattern involves provisioning one or more physical or virtual hosts. Each of the hosts then executes multiple services. In this pattern, there are two variants. Each service instance is a process in one of these variants. In another variant of this pattern, more than one service instance might run simultaneously. One of the most beneficial features of this pattern is its efficiency in terms of resources, as well as its seamless deployment. This pattern has the benefit of having a low overhead, making it possible to start the service quickly. This pattern has the major drawback of requiring a service instance to run in isolation as a separate process. The resource consumption of each instance of a service becomes difficult to determine and monitor when several processes are deployed in the same process. The Service Instance per Host pattern is a deployment strategy in which only one microservice instance can execute on a particular host at a specific time. Note that the host can be a virtual machine or a container running just one service instance simultaneously.
The buzz surrounding microservices in recent years doesn't reflect the sudden emergence of the microservices concept at that time, however. Microservices architectures actually have a long history that stretches back decades. But they didn't really catch on and gain mainstream focus until the early-to-mid 2010s. So, why did everyone go gaga over microservices starting about ten years ago? That's a complex question, but the answer probably involves the popularization around the same time of two other key trends: DevOps and cloud computing. You don't need microservices to do DevOps or use the cloud, but microservices can come in handy in both of these contexts. For DevOps, microservices make it easier in certain important respects to achieve continuous delivery because they allow you to break complex codebases and applications into smaller units that are easier to manage and easier to deploy. And in the cloud, microservices can help to consume cloud resources more efficiently, as well as to improve the reliability of cloud apps.
A fundamental principle of OT security is the need to create an air gap between ICS and OT systems and IT systems. This basic network cybersecurity design employs an industrial demilitarized zone to prevent threat actors from moving laterally across systems, but the survey finds that only about half of organizations have an IDMZ within their OT architecture, and 8% are working on it. The healthcare, public health and emergency services sectors were especially behind. Nearly 40% of respondents in those sectors don't have plans to implement an IDMZ. Implementing a DMZ is a basic best practice, Ford says. "The risk is lateral movement where breach can move from IT to OT or vice versa, or from low-value network assets to high-value network assets," Ford says. "The more attackers can penetrate your infrastructure, the greater damage and downtime they can cause. Segmentation in DMZ, demilitarized zones, provide an air gap between IT and OT, and additional segmentation can further protect business-critical assets with strong access controls, firewalls and policy rules based on zero trust."
Dangling a carrot of free technology is a way to engage customers, but protection is vital should wearable technology be compromised. This data isn’t simply name, address and payment details, but potentially highly personal data about an individuals’ wellbeing. The insurance industry will need to develop solutions that help protect the policyholder, and reassure the individual that their data is secure. With GDPR, UK-GDPR and other regulations globally to be highly considered, insurers are spending considerable time and investment in ensuring data is well protected. The ubiquitous nature of wearables has helped increase engagement with insurance, and customers have been introduced to the numerous health benefits of using these devices. If you’ve already got a device tracking your wellbeing, why would you not want a doctor also doing the same? By becoming an extension to the wearable itself, wearable insurance is likely to be generally accepted by customers.
Quote for the day:
"Different times need different types of leadership." -- Park Geun-hye