Quote for the day:
"What seems to us as bitter trials are often blessings in disguise." -- Oscar Wilde
The CIO Playbook: Reimagining Transformation in a Shifting Economy
/dq/media/media_files/2025/12/18/the-cio-playbook-2025-12-18-16-35-26.jpg)
The CIO has travelled from managing mainframes to managing meaning and
purpose-driven transformation. And as AI becomes the nervous system of the
enterprise, technology’s centre of gravity has shifted decisively to the
boardroom. The basement may be gone, but its persona remains — a reminder
that every evolution begins with resistance and is ultimately tamed by the quiet
persistence of those who keep the systems running and the vision alive. Those
who embraced progressive technology and blended business with innovation became
leaders; the rest faded into also-rans. At the end of the day, the concern isn’t
technology — it’s transformation capacity and the enterprise’s appetite to take
risks, embrace change, and stay relevant. Organisations that lack this mindset
will fail to evolve from traditional enterprises into intelligent, interactive
digital ecosystems built for the AI age. The question remains: how do you paint
the plane while flying it — and keep repainting it as customer needs, markets,
and technologies shift mid-air? In this GenAI-driven era, the enterprise must
think like software: in continuous integration, continuous delivery, and
continuous learning. This isn’t about upgrading systems; it’s about rewiring
strategy, culture, and leadership to respond in real time. We are at a defining
inflection point. The time is now to connect the dots — to build an experience
delivery matrix that not only works for your organisation but evolves with your
customer.Flexibility or Captivity? The Data Storage Decision Shaping Your AI Future
Enterprises today must walk a tightrope: on one side, harness the performance,
trust, and synergies of long-standing storage vendor relationships; on the
other, avoid entanglements that limit their ability to extract maximum value
from their data, especially as AI makes rapid reuse of massive unstructured
data sets a strategic necessity. ... Financial barriers also play a role.
Opaque or punitive egress fees charged by many cloud providers can make it
prohibitively expensive to move large volumes of data out of their
environments. At the same time, workflows that depend on a vendor’s APIs,
caching mechanisms, or specific interfaces can make even technically feasible
migrations risky and disruptive. ... Budget and performance pressures add
another layer of urgency. You can save tremendously by offloading cold data to
lower-cost storage tiers. Yet if retrieving that data requires rehydration,
metadata reconciliation, or funneling requests through proprietary gateways,
the savings are quickly offset. Finally, the rapid evolution of technology
means enterprises need flexibility to adopt new tools and services. Being
locked into a single vendor makes it harder to pivot as the landscape changes.
... Longstanding vendor relationships often provide stability, support, and
volume pricing discounts. Abandoning these partnerships entirely in the
pursuit of perfect flexibility could undermine those benefits. The more
pragmatic approach is to partner deeply while insisting on open standards and
negotiating agreements that preserve data mobility.Agentic AI already hinting at cybersecurity’s pending identity crisis
First, many of these efforts are effectively shadow IT, where a line of
business (LOB) executive has authorized the proof of concept to see what these
agents can do. In these cases, IT or cyber teams haven’t likely been involved,
and so security hasn’t been a top priority for the POC. Second, many
executives — including third-party business partners handling supply chain,
distribution, or manufacturing — have historically cut corners for POCs
because they are traditionally confined to sandboxes isolated from the
enterprise’s live environments. But agentic systems don’t work that way. To
test their capabilities, they typically need to be released into the general
environment. The proper way to proceed is for every agent in your environment
— whether IT authorized, LOB launched, or that of a third party — to be
tracked and controlled by PKI identities from agentic authentication vendors.
... “Traditional authentication frameworks assume static identities and
predictable request patterns. Autonomous agents create a new category of risk
because they initiate actions independently, escalate behavior based on
memory, and form new communication pathways on their own. The threat surface
becomes dynamic, not static,” Khan says. “When agents update their own
internal state, learn from prior interactions, or modify their role within a
workflow, their identity from a security perspective changes over time. Most
organizations are not prepared for agents whose capabilities and behavior
evolve after authentication.”Expanding Zero Trust to Critical Infrastructure: Meeting Evolving Threats and NERC CIP
StandardsPrevious compliance requirements have emphasized a perimeter defense
model, leaving blind spots for any threats that happen to breach the
perimeter. Zero Trust initiatives solve this by making accesses inside the
perimeter visible and subjecting them to strong, identity-based policies. This
proactive, Zero Trust-driven model naturally fulfills CIP-015-1 requirements,
reducing or eliminating false positives compared to threat detection methods.
In fact, an organization with a mature Zero Trust posture should be able to
operate normally, even if the network is compromised. This resilience is
possible when critical assets—such as controls in electrical substations or
business software in the data center—are properly shielded from the shared
network. Zero Trust enforces access based on verified identity, role, and
context. Every connection is authenticated, authorized, encrypted, and logged.
... In short, Zero Trust’s identity-centric enforcement ensures that
unauthorized network activity is detected and blocked. Even if a hacker has
network access, they won’t be able to leverage that access to exfiltrate data
or attack other hosts. A Zero Trust-protected organization can operate
normally, even if the network is compromised. ... Zero Trust doesn’t replace
your perimeter but instead reinforces it. Rather than replacing existing
network firewalls, a Zero Trust can overlay existing security architectures,
providing a comprehensive layer of defense through identity-based control and
traffic visibility.
Top 5 enterprise tech priorities for 2026
The first is that the top priority, cited by 211 of the enterprises, is to
“deploy the hardware, software, data, and network tools needed to optimize AI
project value.” ... “You can’t totally immunize yourself against a massive cloud
or Internet problem,” say planners. Most cloud outages, they note, resolve in a
maximum of a few hours, so you can let some applications ride things out. When
you know the “what,” you can look at the “how.” Is multi-cloud the best
approach, or can you build out some capacity in the data center? ... “We have
too many things to buy and to manage,” one planner said. “Too many sources, too
many technologies.” Nobody thinks they can do some massive fork-lift
restructuring (there’s no budget), but they do believe that current projects can
be aligned to a long-term simplification strategy. This, interestingly, is seen
by over a hundred of the group as reducing the number of vendors. They think
that “lock-in” is a small price to pay for greater efficiency and reduction in
operations complexity, integration, and fault isolation. ... The biggest
problem, these enterprises say, is that governance has tended to be applied to
projects at the planning level, meaning that absent major projects, governance
tended to limp along based on aging reviews. Enterprises note that, like AI,
orderly expansions in how applications and data are used can introduce
governance issues, just like changes in laws and regulations.
Why flaky tests are increasing, and what you can do about it
One of the most persistent challenges is the lack of visibility into where
flakiness originates. As build complexity rises, false positives or flaky tests
often rise in tandem. In many organizations, CI remains a black box stitched
together from multiple tools as artifact size increases. Failures may stem from
unstable test code, misconfigured runners, dependency conflicts or resource
contention, yet teams often lack the observability needed to pinpoint causes
with confidence. Without clear visibility, debugging becomes guesswork and
recurring failures become accepted as part of the process rather than issues to
be resolved. The encouraging news is that high-performing teams are addressing
this pattern directly. ... Better tooling alone will not solve the problem.
organizations need to adopt a mindset that treats CI like production
infrastructure. That means defining performance and reliability targets for test
suites, setting alerts when flakiness rises above a threshold and reviewing
pipeline health alongside feature metrics. It also means creating clear
ownership over CI configuration and test stability so that flaky behaviour is
not allowed to accumulate unchecked. ... Flaky tests may feel like a quality
issue, but they are also a performance problem and a cultural one. They shape
how developers perceive the reliability of their tools. They influence how
quickly teams can ship. Most importantly, they determine whether CI/CD remains a
source of confidence or becomes a source of drag.Stop letting ‘urgent’ derail delivery. Manage interruptions proactively
As engineers and managers, we all have been interrupted by those unplanned,
time-sensitive requests (or tasks) that arrive outside normal planning cadences.
An “urgent” Slack, a last-minute requirement or an exec ask is enough to nuke
your standard agile rituals. Apart from randomizing your sprint, it causes
thrash for existing projects and leads to developer burnout. ... Existing
team-level mechanisms like mid-sprint checkpoints provide teams the opportunity
to “course correct”; however, many external randomizations arrive with an
immediacy. ... Even well-triaged items can spiral into open-ended investigations
and implementations that the team cannot afford. How do we manage that? Time-box
it. Just a simple “we’ll execute for two days, then regroup” goes a long way in
avoiding rabbit-holes. The randomization is for the team to manage, not for an
individual. Teams should plan for handoffs as a normal part of supporting
randomizations. Handoffs prevent bottlenecks, reduce burnout and keep the rest
of the team moving. ... In cases where there are disagreements on priority,
teams should not delay asking for leadership help. ... Without making it a heavy
lift, teams should capture and periodically review health metrics. For our team,
% unplanned work, interrupts per sprint, mean time to triage and periodic
sentiment survey helped a lot. Teams should review these within their existing
mechanisms (ex., sprint retrospectives) for trend analysis and adjustments.
How does Agentic AI enhance operational security
With Agentic AI, the deployment of automated security protocols becomes more contextual and responsive to immediate threats. The implementation of Agentic AI in cybersecurity environments involves continuous monitoring and assessment, ensuring that NHIs and their secrets remain fortified against evolving threats. ... Various industries have begun to recognize the strategic importance of integrating Agentic AI and NHI management into their security frameworks. Financial services, healthcare, travel, DevOps, and Security Operations Centers (SOC) have benefited from these technologies, especially those heavily reliant on cloud environments. In financial services, for instance, securing hybrid cloud environments is paramount to protecting sensitive client data. Healthcare institutions, with their vast troves of personal health information, have seen significant improvements in data protection through the use of these advanced cybersecurity measures. ... Agentic AI is reshaping how decisions are made in cybersecurity by offering algorithmic insights that enhance human judgment. Incorporating Agentic AI into cybersecurity operations provides the data-driven insights necessary for informed decision-making. Agentic AI’s capacity to process vast amounts of data at lightning speed means it can discern subtle signs of an impending threat long before a human analyst might notice. By providing detailed reports and forecasts, it offers decision-makers a 360-degree view of their security.AI-fuelled cyber onslaught to hit critical systems by 2026
"Historically, operational technology cyber security incidents were the domain
of nation states, or sometimes the act of a disgruntled insider. But recently,
we've seen year-on-year rises in operational technology ransomware from criminal
groups as well and with hacktivists: All major threat actor categories have
bridged the IT-OT gap. With that comes a shift from highly targeted, strategic
campaigns to the types of opportunistic attacks CISA describes. These are the
predators targeting the slowest gazelles, so to speak," said Dankaart. ...
Australian policymakers are expected to revise cybersecurity legislation and
regulations for critical sectors. Morris added that organisations are looking at
overseas case studies to reduce fraud and infrastructure-level attacks. ... "The
scam ecosystem will continue to be exposed globally, raising new awareness of
the many aspects of these crimes, including payment processors, geographic
distribution of call centres and connected financial crimes. ... "The solution
will be to find the 'Goldilocks Spot' of high automation and human
accountability, where AI aggregates related tasks, alerts and presents them as a
single decision point for a human to make. Humans then make one accountable,
auditable policy decision rather than hundreds to thousands of potentially
inconsistent individual choices; maintaining human oversight while still
leveraging AI's capacity for comprehensive, consistent work."
No comments:
Post a Comment