Quote for the day:
"Nothing in the world is more common than unsuccessful people with talent." -- Anonymous
The rise of the chief trust officer: Where does the CISO fit?
Trust is touted as a differentiator for organizations looking to strengthen
customer confidence and find a competitive advantage. Trust cuts across
security, privacy, compliance, ethics, customer assurance, and internal culture.
For the custodians of trust, that’s a wide-ranging remit without the obvious
definition of other C-suite roles. Typically, the CISO continues to own controls
and protection, while the CTrO broadens the remit to reputation, ethics, and
customer confidence. Where cybersecurity reports to the CTrO, it is a way to
escape IT and the competing priorities with the CIO. This partnership
repositions security from ‘department of no’ to business enabler, Forrester
notes. ... Patel says that strong alignment between customer trust and business
strategy is critical. “If you don’t have credibility in the marketplace, with
your partners and customers, your business strategy is dead on arrival,” he
tells CSO. Whereas CISO’s day-to-day responsibilities include checking on the
SOC, reviewing alerts, GRC, managing other security operations and board
reporting, the chief trust officer role weaves customer trust throughout, says
Patel. “It’s really bringing that trust lens into the decision-making equation
and challenging colleagues and partners to think in the same manner.” ... There
is also the question of how organizations operationalize trust — and can it be
measured? No off-the-shelf platform exists, so CTrOs must build their own
dashboards combining customer and employee metrics to track trends and identify
early signs of trust erosion.When Machines Attack Machines: The New Reality of AI Security
Attackers decomposed tasks and distributed them across thousands of instructions fed into multiple Claude instances, masquerading as legitimate security tests and circumventing guardrails. The campaign’s velocity and scale dwarfed what human operators could manage, representing a fundamental leap for automated adversarial capability. Anthropic detected the operation by correlating anomalous session patterns and observing operational persistence achievable only through AI-driven task decomposition at superhuman speeds. Though AI-generated attacks sometimes faltered—hallucinating data, forging credentials, or overstating findings—the impact proved significant enough to trigger immediate global warnings and precipitate major investments in new safeguards. Anthropic concluded that this development brings advanced offensive tradecraft within reach of far less sophisticated actors, marking a turning point in the balance between AI’s promise and peril. ... AI-based offensive operations exploit vulnerabilities across entire ecosystems instantly with the goal of exfiltrating critical intelligence and causing damage to the target. Offensive AI iterates adversarial attacks and novel exploits on a scale human red teams cannot attain. Defenses that work well against traditional techniques often fail outright under continuous, machine-driven attack cycles.From chatbots to colleagues: How agentic AI is redefining enterprise automation
According to Flores, agentic AI changes that equation. Each agent has a name,
a mission defined by its system prompt, and a connection to company data
through retrieval-augmented generation. Many of them also wield tools such as
CRMs, databases, or workflow platforms. “An agent is like hiring a new
employee who already knows your systems on day one,” Flores said. “It doesn’t
just respond — it executes.” This new mode of collaboration also changes how
employees interact with technology. Flores noted that his clients often name
their agents, treating them as teammates rather than tools. “When marketing
needs to check something, they’ll say, ‘Let’s ask Marco,’” he added. “That
naming makes adoption easier — it feels human.” ... One of IBM’s first success
stories came with password resets — an unglamorous but ubiquitous use case.
Two agents now collaborate: one triages the request, while the other verifies
credentials and performs the reset, all under the company’s
identity-and-access-management system. Each agent has its own digital
identity, ensuring audit trails and preventing impersonation. ... Agentic AI
isn’t a software upgrade — it’s a redesign of how digital work gets done. Each
of the leaders interviewed for this story emphasized that success depends as
much on data and governance as on culture and experimentation. Before moving
beyond chatbots, IT directors should ask not only “Can we do this?” but “Where
should we start — and how do we do it safely?”What to look for in an AI implementation partner
Good AI implementation partners need not be limited to big professional
services firms. Smaller firms such as AI consultancies and startups can
provide lots of value. Regardless, many organizations require outside
expertise when deploying, monitoring, and maintaining AI tools and services.
... “Many firms understand AI tools at a surface level, but what truly matters
is the ability to contextualize AI within the nuances of a specific industry,”
says Hrishi Pippadipally, CIO at accounting and business advisory firm Wiss.
... An effective partner must be able to balance innovation with the
guardrails of security, privacy, and industry-specific compliance, Agrawal
adds. “Otherwise, IT leaders will inherit long-term liabilities,” he says. ...
“The mistake many organizations make is focusing only on technical credentials
or flashy demos,” Agrawal says. “What’s often overlooked and what I prioritize
is whether the partner can embed AI into existing workflows without disrupting
business continuity. A good partner knows how to integrate AI so that it
doesn’t just work in theory, but delivers impact in the complex reality of
enterprise operations.” ... “Most evaluation checklists focus on the technical
side — security, compliance, data governance, etc.,” says Sara Gallagher,
president of The Persimmon Group, a business management consultancy. “While
that matters, too many execs are skipping over the thornier questions.Magnetic tape is going strong in the age of AI, and it's about to get even better
“Aramid permits the manufacture of significantly thinner and smoother media,
enabling longer tape lengths in a standard LTO Ultrium cartridge form
factor,” the organization noted in a statement. “This material innovation
provides an extra 10 TB of native capacity than the currently available 30
TB LTO-10 cartridge, which is manufactured using different materials.”
Stephen Bacon, VP for data protection solutions product management at HPE,
said the new cartridges are aimed at enterprises spanning an array of
industries dealing with high data volumes, from manufacturing to financial
services. “AI has turned archives into strategic assets,” Bacon commented.
... Tape storage has a number of distinct advantages, including low cost,
durability, and easy portability. According to previous analysis from the
LTO Program, companies using tape recorded an 86% lower total cost of
ownership (TCO) compared to disk storage. TCO compared to cloud storage was
also 66% lower across a 10 year period, figures showed. Notably, the use of
tape for unstructured data storage also adds to the appeal, with this now
vital in the training process for large language models (LLMs). ...
Long-term, tape storage is only going to improve, at least if the LTO
Program’s roadmap is to be believed. Through generations 11 through to 14,
enterprises can expect to see significant capacity gains, eventually peaking
with a 913 TB cartridge.The rebellion against robot drivel
LLMs are “lousy writers and (most importantly!) they are not you,” Cantrill
argues. That “you” is what persuades. We don’t read Steinbeck’s The Grapes
of Wrath to find a robotic approximation of what desperation and hurt seem
to be; we read it because we find ourselves in the writing. No one needs to
be Steinbeck to draft press releases, but if that press release sounds
samesy and dull, does it really matter that you did it in 10 seconds with an
LLM versus an hour on your own mental steam? A few years ago, a friend in
product marketing told me that an LLM generated better sales collateral than
the more junior product marketing professionals he’d hired. His verdict was
that he would hire fewer people and rely on LLMs for that collateral, which
only got a few dozen downloads anyway, from a sales force that numbered in
the thousands. Problem solved, right? Wrong. If few people are reading the
collateral, it’s likely the collateral isn’t needed in the first place.
Using LLMs to save money on creating worthless content doesn’t seem to be
the correct conclusion. Ditto using LLMs to write press releases or other
marketing content. I’ve said before that the average press release sounds
like it was written by a computer (and not a particularly advanced
computer), so it’s fine to say we should use LLMs to write such drivel. But
isn’t it better to avoid the drivel in the first place? Good PR people think
about content and its place in a wider context rather than just mindlessly
putting out press releases.AI’s Impact on Mental Health
“Talking to a therapist can be intimidating, expensive, or complicated to
access, and sometimes you need someone—or something—to listen at that exact
moment,’’ said Stephanie Lewis, a licensed clinical social worker and
executive director of Epiphany Wellness addiction and mental health
treatment centers. Chatbots allow people to vent, process their feelings,
and get advice without worrying about being judged or misunderstood, Lewis
said. “I also see that people who struggle with anxiety, social discomfort,
or trust issues sometimes find it easier to open up to a chatbot than a real
person.” Users are “often looking for a safe space to express emotions,
receive reassurance, or find quick stress-management strategies,’’ added Dr.
Bryan Bruno, medical director of Mid City TMS, a New York City-based medical
center focused on treating depression. ... “Chatbots created for therapy are
often built with input from mental health professionals and integrate
evidence-based approaches, like cognitive behavioral therapy techniques,’’
Tse said. “They can prompt reflection and guide users toward actionable
steps.” Lewis agreed that some therapeutic chatbots are designed with real
therapy techniques, like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which can help
manage stress or anxiety. “They can guide users through breathing exercises,
mindfulness techniques, and journaling prompts, all great tools,” she
said.Holistic Engineering: Organic Problem Solving for Complex Evolving Systems & Late projects.
At its heart, industrial AI is about automating and optimising business
processes to improve decision-making, enhance efficiency and increase
profitability. It requires the collection of vast volumes of data from
sources like IoT sensors, cameras, and back-office systems, and the
application of machine and deep learning algorithms to surface insights. In
some cases, the AI powers robots to supercharge automation, and in others,
it utilises edge computing for faster, localised processing. Agentic AI
helps firms go even further, by working autonomously, dynamically and
intelligently to achieve the goals it is set. ... “You get the data in from
IoT and you trigger that as an anomaly,” says Pederson. “You analyse the
anomaly against all your historic records – other incidents that have
happened with customers and how they have been fixed. You relate it to your
knowledge base articles. And then you relate it to your inventory on your
service vans, like which service vans and which technicians are equipped to
do the job. “So it’s the whole estate of structured, unstructured and
processed data. In the past, they would send a technician out, and they
could get it right 84% of the time. Now they have improved their first-time
fix rate to 97%.” Both this and the aforementioned field service deployment
feature an “agentic dispatcher” which autonomously creates and publishes the
schedules to the relevant service technicians, updates their calendar and
suggests the best route to take. “In the very near future, AI agents will
not only be helping to address work for people behind a desk, but guiding
robots directly,” says Pederson.What security pros should know about insurance coverage for AI chatbot wiretapping claims
There are subtle differences in the way courts are viewing privacy
litigation arising from the use of AI chatbots in comparison to litigation
involving analytical tools like session reply or cookies. Both claims
involve allegations that a third party is intercepting communications
without proper consent, often under state wiretapping laws, but the legal
arguments and defenses vary because the data being collected is different.
... Whether or not an exclusion will ultimately impact coverage depends both
on the specific language of the exclusion and also the allegations raised in
the underlying lawsuit. For example, broadly worded exclusions with
“catch-all” phrases precluding coverage for any statutory violation may be
more difficult for policyholder to overcome than an exclusion that
identifies by name specific statutes. As these claims are relatively new, we
have yet to see significant examples of how this plays out in the context of
insurance coverage litigation. However, we saw similar coverage arguments in
the context of insurance coverage litigation where the underlying suit
alleged violations of the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). ... To
help mitigate risks, organizations should review their user consent
mechanisms for AI Bot Communications. Consent does not always mean signing a
form, but could include prominently displaying chatbot privacy notices
before any data collection, providing easy access to the business’s privacy
policy detailing how chatbot interactions are stored, and using automated
disclaimers at the start of each chat session.
No comments:
Post a Comment