Quote for the day:
"Blessed are those who can give without remembering and take without forgetting." -- Anonymous
One Leader, Two Roles: The CISO-DPO Hybrid Model
The convergence is not without its challenges. The breadth of combined
responsibilities could potentially lead to overload and burnout for leaders
trying to keep pace with evolving technical threats and fast-changing privacy
regulations. In addition, lapses in compliance could lead to hefty penalties for
the organization, particularly as regulatory bodies are now penalizing CISOs for
faltering in their compliance and reporting efforts - a reminder that continuous
learning is not optional, but essential. This hybrid role requires people who
are multi-skilled and knowledgeable in both domains, a seemingly daunting task.
CISOs and DPOs must be viewed as closely associated partners - not as
individuals who can cause a conflict of interest - in their compliance
journey. ... A hybrid role enables faster translation of regulatory
requirements into security controls, resulting in accelerated compliance efforts
and improved resilience overall. An integrated approach thus becomes far more
efficient than individuals operating in silos, such as the DPO having to rely on
a CISO who does not necessarily have a DPO-specific mandate but only an
overarching security focus. Enterprises can create an ecosystem where security
and privacy reinforce each other, and organizations can foster collaboration,
and build trust and long-term value in an era of relentless digital risk.Beyond the Black Box: Building Trust and Governance in the Age of AI
Without enough controls, organizations run the risk of being sanctioned by
regulators, losing their reputation, or facing adverse impacts on people and
communities. These threats can be managed only by an agile, collaborative AI
governance model that prioritizes fairness, accountability, and human rights.
... Organizations must therefore strike a balance between openness and
accountability, holding back to protect sensitive assets. This can be achieved
by constructing systems that can explain their decisions clearly, keeping
track of how models are trained, and making decisions using personal or
sensitive data interpretable. ... Methods like adversarial debiasing, sample
reweighting, and human evaluators assist in fixing errors prior to their
amplification, making sure the results reflect values like justice, equity,
and inclusion. ... Privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) promote the
protection of personal data while enabling responsible usage. For example,
differential privacy adds a touch of statistical “noise” to keep individual
identities hidden. Federated learning enables AI models to learn from data
distributed across multiple devices, without needing access to the raw data.
... Compliance must be embedded in the AI lifecycle by means of impact
assessments, documentation, and control scaling, especially for high‑risk
applications like biometric identification or automated decision‑making.The rise of purpose-built clouds
The rise of purpose-built clouds is also driving multicloud strategies.
Historically, many enterprises have avoided multicloud deployments, citing
complexity in managing multiple platforms, compliance challenges, and security
concerns. However, as the need for specialized solutions grows, businesses are
realizing that a single vendor can’t meet their workload demands. ... Another
major reason for purpose-built clouds is data residency and compliance. As
regional rules like those in the European Union become stricter, organizations
may find that general cloud platforms can create compliance issues.
Purpose-built clouds can provide localized options, allowing companies to host
workloads on infrastructure that satisfies regulatory standards without losing
performance. This is especially critical for industries such as healthcare and
financial services that must adhere to strict compliance standards.
Purpose-built platforms enable companies to store data locally for compliance
reasons and enhance workloads with features such as fraud detection,
regulatory reporting, and AI-powered diagnostics. ... The rise of
purpose-built clouds signals a philosophical shift in enterprise IT
strategies. Instead of generic, one-size-fits-all solutions, organizations now
recognize the value in tailoring investments to align directly with business
objectives. Establishing Visibility and Governance for Your Software Supply Chain
Even if your organization isn’t the direct target, you can fall victim to attackers. A supply chain attack designed to gain access to a bank, for example, could also poison your supply chain. The attackers will gladly take your customer information or hold your servers hostage to ransomware. Modern software supply chains are incredibly complex webs of third-party code. To properly secure the supply chain, organizations must first gain visibility into all of the components that go into their applications. This is necessary not just on a per-application basis, but across the entire portfolio. ... The first step is to start building software bills of materials (SBOMs) at build time. The SBOM records what goes into your software, so it is the foundational piece of building asset visibility. You can then use that information to build a knowledge graph about your supply chain, including vulnerabilities and software licenses. When you aggregate these SBOMs across all of your application portfolio, you get a holistic view of all dependencies. ... One final piece of the puzzle is tracking software provenance. Tracking and gating on software provenance gives you another avenue to protect yourself from vulnerable code. This is often overlooked, but given the prevalence of attacks against open source library repositories, it’s more important than ever.Avoiding chain of custody crisis: In-house destruction for audit-proof compliance
Chain of custody refers to the documented and unbroken trail of accountability
that records the lifecycle of a sensitive asset; from creation and use to final
destruction. For data stored on physical media like hard disk drives (HDDs),
solid state drives (SSDs), or e-media, maintaining a secure and traceable chain
of custody is essential for demonstrating regulatory compliance and ensuring
operational integrity. ... With the right high-security equipment, such as
NSA-listed paper shredders, hard drive crushers and shredders, and
disintegrators, destruction can occur at the point of use – or at least within
the facility – under supervision and with real-time documentation. This
eliminates transport risks, reduces reliance on third parties, and keeps
sensitive data within your organization’s security perimeter. ... Compliance
auditors are increasingly looking beyond destruction certificates. They want
transparency. That means policies, procedures, logs, and physical proof. With an
in-house program, organizations can tailor destruction workflows to meet
specific regulatory frameworks, from NIST 800-88 guidelines to DoD or ISO
standards. ... High-security data destruction isn’t just about preventing
breaches. It’s about instilling confidence both internally with leadership and
stakeholders, and externally with regulators and clients. By keeping destruction
in-house, organizations send a clear message: data security is
non-negotiable.If Architectures Could Talk, They’d Quote Your Boss
/articles/architecture-quote-your-boss/en/smallimage/if-architectures-could-talk-they-would-quote-your-boss-thumb-image-1760361447481.jpg)
Architecture doesn’t fail in the codebase. It fails in the meeting rooms. In the
handoffs. In the silences between teams who don’t talk — or worse, assume they
understand each other. The real complexity lives between the lines — not of
code, but of communication. And once we stop pretending otherwise, we begin to
see that the technical is inseparable from the social. ... There’s a deep irony
in the fact that many of us in software come from a binary world — one shaped by
certainty, logic, and repeatability. We’re trained to seek out 1s and 0s, true
or false, compile or fail. But architecture lives in the fog — in uncertainty,
trade-offs, and risk. It’s not a world of 1s and 0s, but of shifting constraints
and grey zones. Where engineers long for clarity, architecture demands comfort
with ambiguity. Decisions rarely have a single correct answer — they have
consequences, compromises, and contexts that evolve over time. It’s a game of
incomplete information, where clarity emerges only through conversation,
alignment, and compromise. This also explains why so many of our colleagues feel
frustrated. Requirements change. Priorities shift. Stakeholders contradict each
other. And it’s tempting to see all that as failure. But it’s not failure — it’s
the environment. It’s how complex systems grow. Architecture isn’t about
eliminating uncertainty. It’s about giving teams just enough structure to move
within it with confidence.
CIOs’ AI confidence yet to match results
According to a new survey from AIOps observability provider Riverbed, 88% of
technical specialists and business and IT leaders believe their organizations
will make good on their AI expectations, despite only 12% currently having AI in
enterprise-wide production. Moreover, just one in 10 AI projects have been fully
deployed, respondents say, suggesting that enthusiasm is significantly outpacing
the ability to deliver. ... One problem with IT leaders’ possible overconfidence
about AI expectations is that most organizations have no concrete expectations
to begin with, says Warren Wilbee, CTO of supply chain software provider
ToolsGroup. “Are the expectations a 10% productivity again, or a 2% drop in
staffing?” he says. “The expectations are ill-defined.” Other AI experts see AI
enthusiasm outpacing the difficulties of deploying the technology. In many
cases, company leaders underestimate the technology requirements and the
compliance and governance demands, says Patrizia Bertini, managing partner at UK
IT regulatory advisory firm Aligned Consulting Group. ... Many organizations’
leaders don’t understand the full implications of rolling out and using AI, he
says, with many not realizing the extent to which the technology will change the
nature of work. Instead of executing tasks, many employees will manage agents
that complete those tasks — a seismic shift. “Agentic AI holds enormous
potential, but the path to full deployment will take time, requiring effort and
investment,” he says.
What if your privacy tools could learn as they go?
The research explains that traditional local differential privacy methods tend
to be conservative because they assume no knowledge about the data. This leads
to adding more noise than needed, which harms data utility. The PML approach
narrows that gap by making use of whatever knowledge can be safely derived from
the data itself. This design shift resonates with challenges seen in industry.
... Beyond the case studies, the research provides a set of mathematical results
that can be applied to other privacy settings. It shows how to compute optimal
mechanisms under uncertainty, including closed-form solutions for simple binary
data and a convex optimization program for more complex datasets. These results
mean that privacy engineers could, in theory, design systems that automatically
adjust to the available data. The framework explains how to choose privacy
parameters to meet a desired balance between protection and accuracy, given a
known probability of error. ... This research offers a way to improve one of the
biggest tradeoffs in privacy engineering: the loss of utility caused by assuming
no prior knowledge about the data-generating process. By allowing systems to
safely incorporate limited, empirically derived information, it becomes possible
to provide strong privacy guarantees while preserving more data usefulness. The
findings also suggest that privacy guarantees do not have to come at such a
steep cost to data utility.
13 cybersecurity myths organizations need to stop believing
Big tech platforms have strong verification that prevents impersonation - Some
of the largest tech platforms like to talk about their strong identity checks as
a way to stop impersonation. But looking good on paper is one thing, and holding
up to the promise in the real world is another. “The truth is that even advanced
verification processes can be easily bypassed,” says Ben Colman ... Buying more
tools can bolster cybersecurity protection - One of the biggest traps businesses
fall into is the assumption that they need more tools and platforms to protect
themselves. And once they have those tools, they think they are safe.
Organizations are lured into buying products “touted as the silver-bullet
solution,” says Ian McShane. “This definitely isn’t the key to success.” Buying
more tools doesn’t necessarily improve security because they often don’t have a
tools problem but an operational one. ... Hiring more people will solve the
cybersecurity problem - Professionals who are truly talented and dedicated to
security are not that easy to find. So instead of searching for people to hire,
businesses should prioritize retaining their cybersecurity professionals. They
should invest in them and offer them the chance to gain new skills. “It is
better to have a smaller group of highly trained IT professionals to keep an
organization safe from cyber threats and attacks, rather than a disparate larger
group that isn’t equipped with the right skills,” says McShane.
No comments:
Post a Comment